What should we judge when we judge art?

Author Topic: What should we judge when we judge art?  (Read 344 times)

Offline Shamsuddin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
  • Test
    • View Profile
What should we judge when we judge art?
« on: December 06, 2013, 08:34:15 AM »
What should we judge when we judge art?

Nature provides aesthetic ideals.
Art can be difficult at the metaphysical and ontological levels as well as at the value theory level. When we see a performance of Hamlet, how many works of art are we experiencing, and which should we judge? Perhaps there is only one relevant work of art, the whole performance, which many different people have contributed to, and which will exist briefly and then disappear. Perhaps the manuscript by Shakespeare is a distinct work of art from the play by the troupe, which is also distinct from the performance of the play by this troupe on this night, and all three can be judged, but are to be judged by different standards.
Perhaps every person involved should be judged separately on his or her own merits, and each costume or line is its own work of art (with perhaps the director having the job of unifying them all). Similar problems arise for music, film, dance, and even painting. Is one to judge the painting itself, the work of the painter, or perhaps the painting in its context of presentation by the museum workers?
These problems have been made even more difficult by the rise of conceptual art since the 1960s. Warhol's famous Brillo Boxes are nearly indistinguishable from actual Brillo boxes at the time. It would be a mistake to praise Warhol for the design of his boxes (which were designed by Steve Harvey), yet the conceptual move of exhibiting these boxes as art in a museum together with other kinds of paintings is Warhol's. Are we judging Warhol's concept? His execution of the concept in the medium? The curator's insight in letting Warhol display the boxes?  The overall result? Our experience or interpretation of the result? Ontologically, how are we to think of the work of art? Is it a physical object? Several objects? A class of objects? A mental object?  A fictional object? An abstract object?  An event? or simply an Act?


Source: Internet
Abu Kalam Shamsuddin
Lecturer
MTCA