Allen, T. D., Facteau, J. D., &Facteau, C. L. (2004). Structured interviewing for OCB: Construct validity, faking, and the effects of question type. Human Performance, 17,1−24. Armour, S. (2005, February). Pregnant workers report growing discrimination. USA Today. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2005-02-16-pregnancy-bias-usat_x.htm
Arthur, W., Jr., &Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435−442.
Arthur, W., Jr., Woehr, D. J., &Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical examination of the assessment construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813−835.
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Paronto, M. E., Weekley, J. A., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Applicant reactions to different selection technology: Face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 135−148.
Becton, J. B., Field, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Jones-Farmer, A. (2008). Racial differences in promotion candidate performance and reactions to selection procedures: A field study in a diverse top-management context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 265−285.
Bernardin, H. J., Cooke, D. K., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232−236. Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Landers, R. N. (2007). Revisiting interview-cognitive ability relationships: Attending to specific range restriction mechanisms in meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 837−874.
Blackman, M. C. (2002). The employment interview via the telephone: Are we sacrificing accurate personality judgments for cost efficiency? Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 208−223.
Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (2002). Effective interview practices for accurately assessing counterproductive traits. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 109−116.
Bozionelos, N. (2005). When the inferior candidate is offered the job: The selection interview as a political and power game. Human Relations, 58, 1605−1631. Bragger, J. D., Kutcher, E., Morgan, J., & Firth, P. (2002). The effects of the structured interview on reducing biases against pregnant job applicants. Sex Roles, 46, 215−226. Brtek, M. D., &Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185−191.
Buckley, M. R., Jackson, K. A., Bolino, M. C., Veres, J. G., III, & Field, H. S. (2007). The influence of relational demography on panel interview ratings: A field experiment.Personnel Psychology, 60, 627−646.
Camp, R., Schulz, E., Vielhaber, M., & Wagner-Marsh, F. (2004). Human resource professionals' perceptions of team interviews. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 490−505. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655−702.
Carless, S. A., &Imber, A. (2007). The influence of perceived interviewer and job organizational characteristics on applicant attraction and job choice intentions: The role of applicant anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 359−371.
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., & Webster, J. (2003). Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: A field investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 944−953.
Chapman, D. S., & Zweig, D. I. (2005). Developing a nomological network for interview structure: Antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 58, 673−702.