Rework and Scope Management

Author Topic: Rework and Scope Management  (Read 2968 times)

Offline Badshah Mamun

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1999
    • View Profile
    • Daffodil International University
Rework and Scope Management
« on: April 26, 2012, 07:07:56 PM »

Introduction

This article is a follow up of the earlier one related to the project management processes for an automation tool. This tool is to be used for automating the processes of a maintenance project in a software company.

Rework


A rework can arise due to:


    Change in scope
    Quality of the deliverables not up to the mark
    Change in requirements that is essentially a change in scope

   
Change in Scope


Rework arising due to change in scope means that the project baseline has to be modified and corresponding changes made to the project management plan, resource plan, schedule plan etc.

Any change in scope affects not only the schedule but the cost as well. So, a proper scope change mechanism would take into account the effect to the schedule as well as the costs associated in carrying out the same.

Considering the scenario where 20 percent of the rework has to be done in the context of the automation tool it means that:

    New features have to be added to the tool
    And new requirements have to be taken into account

There are two aspects of scope management. One is preventive in nature and the other is corrective actions. Rework due to the new requirements falls into the corrective category and a formal change request has to be raised that takes into account the various parameters like changes to the cost and the time.

Rework due to Quality


This is also known as defective repair. In the context of the automation tool, it would mean that the deliverables have not been found satisfactory during testing. The rework has to be fit into the existing schedule as the project charter specifies timely delivery and hence any change to the schedule would involve changes to the cost of the project.
Integrated Change Control

Any change requests should go in through an integrated change management system. All the corrective, preventive and defect repairs are covered here. Any change to the project management plan is covered here.

The following steps have to be taken to accommodate the 20 percent change in the scope

    All the stakeholders have to be informed about how the change would affect the cost, time, risk and other project objectives including quality
    All the change requests have to be categorized as corrective or preventive and suitable action recommended
    Some of the changes can be rejected if found not feasible from a technical or a functional standpoint
    The proposed changes have to fit within the reason the project was initiated. This means that the overall project objectives and the purpose cannot be lost because of some rework.
    Do a root cause analysis and find out whether any further changes can be avoided
    The project management plan has to be updated
    The change control board has to be constituted and made functional
    All the changes to the deliverables have to be reviewed
    The configuration management should be followed in terms of using the correct versions of the components of the project management plan and are being updated in a controlled fashion
    Update the project baselines
    Update the project management plan

In addition, the project manager has to make sure that:


    The final requirements are obtained as soon as possible
    The risks are identified upfront
    Institute a process to control changes
    Roles and responsibilities of the team members are defined
    The business case has to be re-evaluated if the changes are excessive
    Allow only change control requests that are approved by the change control board
    If the changes are excessive and would deviate from the overall project objectives, terminate the existing project and start a new one.

Conclusion


The one overriding priority is to ensure that the customer’s requests are met without compromising on the internal stakeholders needs. A fine balance has to be struck between the objectives of the internal and the external stakeholders.
Md. Abdullah-Al-Mamun (Badshah)
Senior Assistant Director
Daffodil International University
01811-458850
cmoffice@daffodilvarsity.edu.bd
www.daffodilvarsity.edu.bd

www.fb.com/badshahmamun.ju
www.linkedin.com/in/badshahmamun
www.twitter.com/badshahmamun