Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Repon

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
Managerial Accounting / Is depreciation a fixed cost or variable cost?
« on: September 30, 2019, 11:56:50 AM »
Is depreciation a fixed cost or variable cost?

Depreciation is a fixed cost, because it recurs in the same amount per period throughout the useful life of an asset. Depreciation cannot be considered a variable cost, since it does not vary with activity volume.  However, there is an exception. If a business employs a usage-based depreciation methodology, then depreciation will be incurred in a pattern that is more consistent with a variable cost.

For example, a logging machine is depreciated based on the number of hours that it is used, so that depreciation expense will vary with the number of trees cut. If these trees are then sold to generate revenue, then it can be said that the related depreciation behaves more like a variable cost than a fixed cost. However, usage-based depreciation systems are not commonly used, so in most cases depreciation cannot be considered a variable cost.

If depreciation is considered a fixed cost, then it is included in the numerator of the formula used to calculate the break even sales of a business, which is:

Total fixed expenses ÷ Contribution margin % = Break even sales

If depreciation is considered a variable cost, for which a case can be argued if usage-based depreciation is employed, then it is instead used to reduce the amount of the contribution margin percentage in the denominator of the equation.

2
Facebook wants to make cryptocurrency mainstream. Here's how
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/18/tech/facebook-libra-cryptocurrency/index.html
New York (CNN Business)
For the last year, Facebook has been signaling it wants in on the cryptocurrency phenomenon. At its F8 developers conference last month, cofounder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he wants to make sending money as easy as sending a photo: digital, immediate, free and secure.
On Tuesday, the company formally unveiled its highly-anticipated digital currency project. It's called Libra. Facebook (FB) also announced the creation of the Libra Association, an independent organization that will manage the currency, and Calibra, a unit of Facebook that will build applications related to the new digital currency.
Facebook has 2.4 billion users around the world, an audience that could help it spur a bigger mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency than others have yet to generate. At the same time, the announcement comes at a critical moment in Facebook's history. The company is under regulatory and political scrutiny for its massive influence, as well as its mishandling of user data, even as it works to further extend its reach into users' lives.
As part of the announcement, Facebook launched a test version of its blockchain, the technology upon which cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are built. It is open-source software, meaning developers can experiment with building applications on the platform and submit feedback on the code. The currency itself is set to launch in 2020.
"Libra's mission is to be a simple, global currency and financial infrastructure that empowers billions of people," said Facebook's David Marcus, who runs Calibra and headed up the Libra project. One of the aims of the project is to help the 1.7 billion people around the world who don't have bank accounts access a stable currency and financial services.
Over the past year, Facebook put together a team of executives and outside partners to work on Libra. Last May, Marcus, formerly president of PayPal (PYPL), stepped down from his role as head of Facebook Messenger to build a blockchain team within the company.
In recent months, the company established the Libra Association, a not-for-profit governing body that will oversee Libra. Facebook says it did not want to be solely in charge of Libra because it intends for the cryptocurrency to be a "public good."
The group has 28 founding members — companies and nonprofits from several different countries — including Facebook, which says it will have just one equal vote. The association will be based in Geneva and officially take up its post this week overseeing the rollout of Libra. Facebook hopes to have 100 association members by the 2020 launch.
Among the founding members are heavy hitters in the tech, finance and nonprofit sectors, including Mastercard (MA), Uber (UBER), Mercy Corps and Andreesen Horowitz. These partners bring expertise in areas key to the project: international financial regulations, blockchain and the financial needs of poor communities around the world.
How Libra will work
Users will be able to access Libra in a number of ways, not just through Facebook.
Facebook's new subsidiary Calibra will build a "wallet" application for people to use Libra, send it to their friends and make purchases on Facebook and Instagram. A button on Whatsapp and Messenger will allow users to send Libra in their message threads, the same way they send GIFs or emojis. Calibra will also operate as a standalone app.
Other companies will be able to build similar applications. For example, a bank could build an application allowing users to take out a loan in Libra, or a retail company could plug into the network so users can make payments in the digital currency.
But Libra will still face a hurdle to get widely adopted.
To get Libra, users will need to transfer the money through their bank or go to a local money exchange to trade local currency for it. And for a user to spend the money their friend sent over Messenger without first depositing it back into their bank account will require, say, their favorite clothing store to accept Libra as payment, too. Though Facebook's large user base will give the cryptocurrency broad exposure initially, the effort's success will depend on consumers being able to do more than just use Libra on Facebook's platforms.
Libra will be backed 1:1 by a bundle of financial assets likely to include bank deposits and short-term government securities from the US Treasury, among others. This will help it avoid the volatility that has plagued other cryptocurrencies like bitcoin.
A coin backed 1:1 is unusual among cryptocurrencies, according to Ari Juels, a professor at the Jacobs Institute at Cornell Tech who studies cryptocurrency. Digital currencies are not often backed this way because that would tie up billions of dollars in reserve currencies that could not be used. Even traditional financial institutions, like US banks, do not fully back deposits this way, hence the need for FDIC deposit insurance.
However, this stability will be essential for the mainstream adoption of Libra, according to Union Square Ventures Partner Fred Wilson. Union Square Ventures has made a number of investments in the cryptocurrency sector in recent years and is a Libra Association founding member.
"People don't want to transact in a cryptocurrency that's not price stabilized," Wilson said. "They don't want to make payments in a currency that could go way up and they don't want to earn in something that could go way down."
Questions about the use of user data and Facebook's role
In recent months, Facebook has faced criticism from users and politicians over privacy and security issues on its platforms, and reports suggest it could face antitrust scrutiny.
Amid rumors of the company's cryptocurrency plans, the US Senate banking committee last month wrote a letter to Zuckerberg asking how the company would protect users' financial data. Facebook said it received the letter and is addressing the senators' questions.
For its part, Facebook said users' financial data will be handled solely by Calibra, and not be shared with Facebook or paired with users' social data.
The company has also been working with financial regulators in the United States and elsewhere. It developed a procedure to verify the identities of people who will use Libra on its platforms, to comply with government rules meant to mitigate cybercrime.
Even though Facebook won't solely control Libra, some in the industry worry that the project isn't in the spirit of the larger cryptocurrency sector, which has prized decentralization.
"With regards to international exposure, it's a positive but that may be where the positives end," said Richard Dennis, founder of cryptocurrency marketplace Temtum, which offers a digital currency. "With Facebook one of the biggest hoarders of personal data on the planet, there's a complete contradiction of what cryptocurrencies are meant to be — no one entity should hold the power, the data or most importantly control user funds."
Ultimately, Facebook is betting on its scale, as well as the customer bases of Libra Association members, to get consumers to buy into the technology.

Union Square Ventures' Wilson compared the project to when Microsoft installed Internet Explorer on all of its computers with Windows software, pushing mainstream consumers to access the internet, a network that had existed previously but hadn't yet infiltrated most households.
"Our hope is that Libra will do the same thing for the world of cryptocurrency," Wilson said. "I think it can be an on-ramp for consumers to this much, much larger world of cryptocurrency that's out there."

3
US jury orders Monsanto to pay $289m in Roundup cancer trial

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/08/jury-orders-monsanto-pay-289m-roundup-trial-180810231800367.html

A California jury has ordered chemical giant Monsanto to pay nearly $290m for failing to warn a dying groundskeeper that its weed killer Roundup might cause cancer.

Jurors on Friday unanimously found that Monsanto acted with malice and that its weed killers Roundup and the professional grade version RangerPro contributed "substantially" to Dewayne Johnson's terminal illness. It also said the company should have provided a label warning of the potential health hazard.

Following eight weeks of trial proceedings, the San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $250m punitive damages, along with compensatory damages and other costs, bringing the total figure to nearly $290m.

"This jury found Monsanto acted with malice and oppression because they knew what they were doing was wrong and doing it with reckless disregard for human life," said Robert F Kennedy Jr, a member of Johnson's legal team. "This should send a strong message to the boardroom of Monsanto."

The company, which has denied any link between the glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, and cancer, vowed to appeal the verdict and "vigorously" defend its product.

Johnson used Roundup and a similar product, Ranger Pro, as a pest control manager at a San Francisco Bay Area school district, his lawyers said. He sprayed large quantities from a 50-gallon (about 3.8 litres) tank attached to a truck, and during gusty winds, the product would cover his face, said Brent Wisner, one of his attorneys.

Once, when a hose broke, the weed killer soaked his entire body.

Johnson read the label and even contacted the company after developing a rash but was never warned it could cause cancer, Wisner said. He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2014 at age 42.

"The simple fact is he is going to die. It's just a matter of time," Wisner told the jury in his opening statement last month.

Looming wave of similar lawsuits

The lawsuit is the first to accuse the product of causing cancer but is a may foreshadow possible outcomes of a looming wave of similar legal challenges. Observers also say a Monsanto defeat likely opens the door to hundreds of other claims against the company, which was recently acquired by Germany's Bayer.
The lawsuit built on the conclusions in 2015 of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a part of the UN World Health Organization, which classified Roundup's main ingredient glyphosate as a probable carcinogen, causing the state of California to follow suit.

However, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says Roundup's active ingredient is safe for people when used in accordance with label directions.

Roundup is Monsanto's leading product and glyphosate is reportedly the world's most commonly used weed killer.

4
US jury orders Monsanto to pay $289m in Roundup cancer trial
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/08/jury-orders-monsanto-pay-289m-roundup-trial-180810231800367.html
A California jury has ordered chemical giant Monsanto to pay nearly $290m for failing to warn a dying groundskeeper that its weed killer Roundup might cause cancer.

Jurors on Friday unanimously found that Monsanto acted with malice and that its weed killers Roundup and the professional grade version RangerPro contributed "substantially" to Dewayne Johnson's terminal illness. It also said the company should have provided a label warning of the potential health hazard.

Following eight weeks of trial proceedings, the San Francisco jury ordered Monsanto to pay $250m punitive damages, along with compensatory damages and other costs, bringing the total figure to nearly $290m.

"This jury found Monsanto acted with malice and oppression because they knew what they were doing was wrong and doing it with reckless disregard for human life," said Robert F Kennedy Jr, a member of Johnson's legal team. "This should send a strong message to the boardroom of Monsanto."

The company, which has denied any link between the glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, and cancer, vowed to appeal the verdict and "vigorously" defend its product.

Johnson used Roundup and a similar product, Ranger Pro, as a pest control manager at a San Francisco Bay Area school district, his lawyers said. He sprayed large quantities from a 50-gallon (about 3.8 litres) tank attached to a truck, and during gusty winds, the product would cover his face, said Brent Wisner, one of his attorneys.

Once, when a hose broke, the weed killer soaked his entire body.

Johnson read the label and even contacted the company after developing a rash but was never warned it could cause cancer, Wisner said. He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2014 at age 42.

"The simple fact is he is going to die. It's just a matter of time," Wisner told the jury in his opening statement last month.

Looming wave of similar lawsuits
The lawsuit is the first to accuse the product of causing cancer but is a may foreshadow possible outcomes of a looming wave of similar legal challenges. Observers also say a Monsanto defeat likely opens the door to hundreds of other claims against the company, which was recently acquired by Germany's Bayer.
The lawsuit built on the conclusions in 2015 of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a part of the UN World Health Organization, which classified Roundup's main ingredient glyphosate as a probable carcinogen, causing the state of California to follow suit.

However, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says Roundup's active ingredient is safe for people when used in accordance with label directions.

Roundup is Monsanto's leading product and glyphosate is reportedly the world's most commonly used weed killer.

5
Chinese investment in Bangladesh rings India alarm bells
Beijing deepens ties across south Asia with billions in infrastructure loans
https://www.ft.com/content/1ab2ebe6-85c3-11e8-96dd-fa565ec55929

When it opens this year, a 6km bridge over the Padma river will link the north and south of Bangladesh by road and rail, completing one of the most challenging engineering projects the country has ever built.

The $3.7bn bridge across the Padma, as the Ganges is known in Bangladesh, will also be a physical reminder of China’s growing presence in the country.

Beijing has provided more than $3bn for the project as part of a wider plan to spend $30bn on Bangladeshi infrastructure schemes.

China stepped in after the World Bank cancelled a $1.2bn credit line for the scheme, saying it had found “credible evidence” of corruption involving government officials and certain executives from SNC-Lavalin, the Canadian constructor contracted to build the project.

The scale of Chinese investment in Bangladesh is further evidence of Beijing’s deepening relationships across south Asia, where it has funded similar projects in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal and the Maldives. It is also ringing alarm bells in India, which surrounds Bangladesh on three sides and considers itself Dhaka’s natural and principal ally.

New Delhi has watched with growing unease in recent years as China has committed billions of dollars’ worth of funding to countries across the subcontinent, helping to fulfil President Xi Jinping’s plans to build a new Silk Road of global trade routes.

“The Padma bridge is a really big and a really important project,” said Amit Bhandari, a fellow at the Mumbai-based Gateway House think-tank. “India should be concerned, given the role China is also playing in other countries which surround it.”

In Pakistan, Beijing is planning to spend $60bn on roads, railways and power plants as part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which will give China access to the sea via Gwadar port on Pakistan’s south coast.

In the Maldives, it has signed a trade agreement and has been handed a contract to build a new airport that was originally granted to the Indian company GMR Infrastructure.

In Sri Lanka, it has taken control of the southern port of Hambantota after Colombo was unable to repay the money it borrowed from Chinese state-backed lenders to build it.

The plans for Bangladesh, however, have caused even greater disquiet in New Delhi because of the strong historic links between the two countries. India helped create Bangladesh when it joined its eastern neighbour’s fight for independence from Pakistan in 1971.

According to Gateway House, China has committed to $31bn worth of projects in Bangladesh, making it the second-biggest recipient of money in south Asia behind Pakistan. They include roads, railways, coal power plants and water treatment facilities.

Ahsan Mansur, the executive director of the Policy Research Institute of Bangladesh, calculates that once private sector investments are also factored in, the figure rises to $42bn.

New Delhi was particularly aggrieved when the Dhaka Stock Exchange chose to sell a 25 per cent stake to a consortium of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges for $119m, rather than to India’s National Stock Exchange, which bid 56 per cent less.

Executives from the NSE travelled to Dhaka in a failed attempt to persuade regulators to block the Chinese deal, arguing that China was using it as a way to gain political power in the region.

Majedur Rahman, managing director at the DSE, said: “We went through a long negotiation and a long period of due diligence, and at the end of it the Chinese bidders won on competence and price.

“We found them to be a good partner, as our capital markets are still very small, and they were offering both new technology and a long-term partnership.”

Meanwhile, Chinese companies are also looking to set up in specially-created economic zones in Bangladesh.

One company, Zhejiang Jindun Pressure Vessel Co Ltd, has offered to invest $5bn in one zone to build up heavy industry near Chittagong, including establishing a 2.6 gigawatt power plant.

Paban Chowdhury, chairman of the Bangladesh Economic Zones Authority, said it was the largest single investment proposal in the history of Bangladesh.

However, there are still signs that India carries enough diplomatic clout to thwart some of Beijing’s plans in Bangladesh — at least if it also has the money to support is stance.

In February 2016, Dhaka cancelled a plan for China to build and operate a deep-sea port at Sonadia, after pressure from New Delhi, which was worried about Chinese interference in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, about 1,000km to the south.

Instead, Bangladesh is allowing investors from several countries, including China, Japan and India, all to invest in a separate port scheme at Payra, further west.

Experts in Bangladesh say the country is happy to accept Chinese money, but does not want China to interfere in anything that India sees as a threat to its national security.

Mr Mansur said: “This is a development opportunity as far as Bangladesh is concerned. We are not interested in security — we want the benefit of the economic relationship.”

6
Business Administration / The Accountant Movie Plot Summary
« on: July 25, 2018, 01:51:43 PM »
The Accountant Movie Plot Summary

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Accountant_(2016_film)

As a child, Christian Wolff is diagnosed with a high-functioning form of autism at Harbor Neuroscience, where he meets the doctor's daughter, Justine. Chris's father declines for his son to stay in a sensory friendly environment, believing that Chris must overcome the hardships inherent in his condition. Afraid that others will exploit his son, Chris's father begins a brutal regimen of stoicism and martial arts training for both him and his brother, Braxton.

In the present, Chris works as a forensic accountant from a small strip mall office. He unmasks insider financial deceptions, often for criminal and terrorist enterprises. His daily regimen includes exposing himself to loud music and flashing lights while abusing his own shinbone on to inure himself to sensory overload.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen) Director Ray King pursues Chris, known to them as "the Accountant" and recruits Treasury data analyst Marybeth Medina to help him locate the Accountant. Her leads include Chris's cover names, a recording from his killing of members of the Gambino crime family, and some photos.

Chris is hired to audit Living Robotics after the company's CEO, Lamar Blackburn, learns of discrepancies from in-house accountant Dana Cummings. Chris digs into the records and finds that over $61 million has been embezzled from the company. That night, CFO Ed Chilton is forced by a hitman to commit suicide via insulin overdose. Lamar dismisses Chris, claiming Chilton killed himself because of the investigation of the embezzlement, leaving Chris very distraught because he cannot finish the audit.

Hitmen show up at one of his tax customer's farms (who invited him to practice shooting at their farm as an act of appreciation for helping them). As a result of his self-defense capabilities, Chris dispatches them all but one. Finding that Dana is the next target, Chris saves her before taking her to his storage unit, containing an Airstream with artwork and other valuables. Chris realizes that the embezzlement at Living Robotics is a scheme; money stolen from the company is returned to it, boosting profits and increasing the company's valuation as it prepares for an IPO, exposing Lamar as the embezzler.

Medina isolates Chris's voice from the recording, hearing him repeating the nursery rhyme Solomon Grundy. She learns that his cadence is reminiscent to autism and that Chris's aliases come from names of famous mathematicians. Using IRS records, she finds his Illinois office.

King later explains to Medina that Chris was imprisoned at Leavenworth where he learned accounting from Francis Silverberg, a Gambino family accountant turned FBI informant. King was Silverberg's handler, but his inaction led to Silverberg's death. King was also investigating the Gambinos when Chris came to avenge his mentor. King began getting information from the Voice when criminals violated Chris's moral code, and King became director of FinCen. The phone rings and the Voice tells Medina about Living Robotics.

Chris goes to Lamar's mansion, where the hitman and his men await. During the battle, the hitman recognizes Chris and greets him. Chris recognizes him as Braxton although they have not seen each other since Chris's imprisonment. Braxton attacks Chris, resentful over his brother's estrangement from him and for their father's death. Lamar arrogantly interrupts and Chris shoots him and amicably agrees to meet Braxton in a week, saying he will find him.

As another set of parents visits Harbor Neuroscience with their child, the boy meets an older Justine; the Voice. Dana receives a Jackson Pollock painting she saw in the trailer as Chris drives out of town.

7
What is the difference between a nominal account and a real account?

The difference between a nominal account and a real account has to do with the balances in the accounts at the end of the accounting year:
The balance in a nominal account is closed at the end of the accounting year. As a result a nominal account begins each accounting year with a zero balance. Since the balance does not carry forward to the next accounting year, a nominal account is also referred to as a temporary account.
The balance in a real account is not closed at the end of the accounting year. Instead, a real account begins each accounting year with its balance from the end of the previous year. Because the end-of-the-year balance is carried forward to the next accounting year, a real account is also known as a permanent account.
The nominal accounts are almost always the income statement accounts such as the accounts for recording revenues, expenses, gains, and losses. When the income statement accounts are closed at the end of the accounting year (perhaps through an income summary account) the net amount will ultimately end up in a balance sheet equity account such as the proprietor's capital account or the corporation's retained earnings account.

The real accounts are the balance sheet accounts such as the accounts for recording assets, liabilities, and the owner's (or stockholders') equity. However, the sole proprietor's drawing account, which is reported on the balance sheet during the year, is a temporary account because it is closed directly to the owner's capital account at the end of the year.

8
Business Administration / What is a suspense account?
« on: July 23, 2018, 03:04:25 PM »
What is a suspense account?

A suspense account is an account in the general ledger in which amounts are temporarily recorded. The suspense account is used because the proper account could not be determined at the time that the transaction was recorded.

When the proper account is determined, the amount will be moved from the suspense account to the proper account.

9
Managerial Accounting / Methods for calculating the break-even point
« on: July 15, 2018, 06:10:17 PM »
Methods for calculating the break-even point
The break-even point is when total revenues and total costs are equal, that is, there is no profit but also no loss made. There are three methods for ascertaining this break-even point:

(1) The equation method
A little bit of simple maths can help us answer numerous different cost‑volume-profit questions.

We know that total revenues are found by multiplying unit selling price (USP) by quantity sold (Q). Also, total costs are made up firstly of total fixed costs (FC) and secondly by variable costs (VC). Total variable costs are found by multiplying unit variable cost (UVC) by total quantity (Q). Any excess of total revenue over total costs will give rise to profit (P). By putting this information into a simple equation, we come up with a method of answering CVP type questions. This is done below continuing with the example of Company A above.

Total revenue – total variable costs – total fixed costs = Profit
(USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = P
(50Q) – (30Q) – 200,000 = P

Note: total fixed costs are used rather than unit fixed costs since unit fixed costs will vary depending on the level of output.

It would, therefore, be inappropriate to use a unit fixed cost since this would vary depending on output. Sales price and variable costs, on the other hand, are assumed to remain constant for all levels of output in the short-run, and, therefore, unit costs are appropriate.

Continuing with our equation, we now set P to zero in order to find out how many items we need to sell in order to make no profit, i.e. to break even:

(50Q) – (30Q) – 200,000 = 0
20Q – 200,000 = 0
20Q = 200,000
Q = 10,000 units.

The equation has given us our answer. If Company A sells less than 10,000 units, it will make a loss. If it sells exactly 10,000 units it will break-even, and if it sells more than 10,000 units, it will make a profit.

(2) The contribution margin method
This second approach uses a little bit of algebra to rewrite our equation above, concentrating on the use of the ‘contribution margin’. The contribution margin is equal to total revenue less total variable costs. Alternatively, the unit contribution margin (UCM) is the unit selling price (USP) less the unit variable cost (UVC). Hence, the formula from our mathematical method above is manipulated in the following way:

(USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = P
(USP – UVC) x Q = FC + P
UCM x Q = FC + P
Q = FC + P
        UCM

So, if P = 0 (because we want to find the break-even point), then we would simply take our fixed costs and divide them by our unit contribution margin. We often see the unit contribution margin referred to as the ‘contribution per unit’.

Applying this approach to Company A again:

UCM = 20, FC = 200,000 and P = 0.
Q = FC
     UCM
Q = 200,000
           20

Therefore, Q = 10,000 units

The contribution margin method uses a little bit of algebra to rewrite our equation above, concentrating on the use of the ‘contribution margin’.

(3) The graphical method
With the graphical method, the total costs and total revenue lines are plotted on a graph; $ is shown on the y axis and units are shown on the x axis. The point where the total cost and revenue lines intersect is the break-even point. The amount of profit or loss at different output levels is represented by the distance between the total cost and total revenue lines.


Hence, it is the difference between the variable cost line and the total cost line that represents fixed costs. The advantage of this is that it emphasizes contribution as it is represented by the gap between the total revenue and the variable cost lines.

10
Managerial Accounting / Cost Volume Profit (CVP) Analysis
« on: July 15, 2018, 06:06:09 PM »
Cost Volume Profit Analysis

Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis is a managerial accounting technique that is concerned with the effect of sales volume and product costs on operating profit of a business. It deals with how operating profit is affected by changes in variable costs, fixed costs, selling price per unit and the sales mix of two or more different products.

CVP analysis has following assumptions:
1. All cost can be categorized as variable or fixed.
2. Sales price per unit, variable cost per unit and total fixed cost are constant.
3. All units produced are sold.

Where the problem involves mixed costs, they must be split into their fixed and variable component by High-Low Method, Scatter Plot Method or Regression Method.

11
কোম্পানির ব্যালান্সশিট কারসাজি ও বিএসইসির ভূমিকা প্রসঙ্গে
আবু আহমেদ
| ১৮:৫৭:০০ মিনিট, জুলাই ১১, ২০১৮
http://bonikbarta.net/bangla/news/2018-07-11/163835/%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%B6%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%9F-%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%BF-%E0%A6%93-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%AD%E0%A7%82%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BE-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%99%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%97%E0%A7%87/

কতই তো ব্যালান্সশিট বা স্থিতিপত্র পড়লাম। লাভ-লোকসানের অংক তালাশ করতে গিয়ে ওইসব পড়েছি। ব্যবসার অ্যাসেট-লায়াবিলিটির চুলচেরা বিশ্লেষণ করেছি। যে অর্থ পাওয়া যাবে বা রিসিভ্যাবলস নিয়ে অনেক মাথা ঘামিয়েছি। রেশিও অ্যানালাইসিস নামে অনুপাতগুলোকে বিশ্লেষণ করে ব্যবসা বা কোম্পানির আর্থিক অবস্থার সবলতা ও দুর্বলতা বুঝতে চেষ্টা করেছি। ব্যবসাভেদে কোম্পানির আর্থিক বিবরণীও ভিন্ন হয়। ব্যাংক কোম্পানি হলে সেই ব্যাংক কুঋণের বিপরীতে প্রভিশনিং বা প্রফিট থেকে হিসাবে অর্থ জমা রাখতে পেরেছে কিনা, কোম্পানি ট্যাক্স-দায় পরিশোধ করেছে কিনা, কোম্পানির ম্যানেজমেন্টে কারা আছেন, লোকগুলো শিক্ষিত এবং সৎ কিনা; সর্বোপরি মোট ইকুইটি মূলধনের কত অংশ কোম্পানির উদ্যোক্তাদের হাতে আছে— এসব দেখতে হয়েছে কোম্পানির ভবিষ্যৎ ব্যবসার ধরন বোঝার জন্য। অনবরত অর্জনের মধ্যে আছে এমন ব্যবসা তো অবশ্যই ভালো। কিন্তু সেই অর্জন তখনই সম্ভব হবে, যদি ম্যানেজমেন্ট দক্ষ ও গতিময় হয়। যে ম্যানেজমেন্ট প্রতিযোগিতার কাছে আত্মসমর্পণ করে, সেই কোম্পানির অর্জন কমতে থাকবে। অনেক ব্যবসা ভালো করেছে, যখন প্রতিযোগিতা ছিল না। বড় কোম্পানি যাদের ব্র্যান্ড ভোক্তা বা ব্যবহারকারীদের কাছে গ্রহণযোগ্যতা আছে, তাদের ব্যবসা করতে সুবিধা হয়। তবে যারা শুধু ব্র্যান্ডনির্ভর, তারা একসময় পিছিয়ে পড়ে। অনেক ব্যবসা প্রতিষ্ঠান ব্র্যান্ডনির্ভর ব্যবসা করতে গিয়ে ভোক্তাকে দুর্বল পণ্য গছিয়ে দিচ্ছে। একদিন ভোক্তা পণ্যের মান সম্পর্কে ঠিকই টের পেয়ে যায়, তখন আর ব্র্যান্ডের মূল্য ধরে রাখা যায় না।

বাংলাদেশে অনেকে ব্র্যান্ডনির্ভর ব্যবসা করছেন। কেউ কেউ ফ্র্যাঞ্চাইজের মাধ্যমে বিদেশী ব্র্যান্ডের খাদ্যপণ্যও বিক্রি করছে। কিন্তু সংবাদ মাধ্যমে যখন দেখি এসব ব্র্যান্ড জরিমানা দিচ্ছে অপরিষ্কার-মানহীন ব্র্যান্ডপণ্য বেচার জন্য, তখন বুঝে নিন আসলে স্থানীয় উদ্যোক্তা অর্থ দিয়ে শুধু নামটাই ভাড়া করে এনেছেন। বাদবাকি সব নিজের মতো করে চালাচ্ছেন।

ফ্র্যাঞ্চাইজ বিক্রেতা বিদেশী কোম্পানি বাংলাদেশে তার ব্র্যান্ডের মান কোথায় যাচ্ছে, তা নিয়ে মাথা ঘামায় না। ফলে ব্র্যান্ড সম্বন্ধেও ভোক্তাদের সতর্ক হওয়ার প্রয়োজন আছে। আবার ব্র্যান্ডও অহরহ নকল হচ্ছে। ভোক্তার চেনার উপায় নেই কোনটা আসল, কোনটা নকল। নতুন ব্যবসা সহজে ব্র্যান্ড ভ্যালু অর্জন করতে পারে না। ব্র্যান্ড ভ্যালু অর্জনের জন্য একটা-দুটো পণ্য বা সেবা বিক্রয় করা যথেষ্ট না-ও হতে পারে। বাংলাদেশে যারা ব্র্যান্ড ভ্যালু অর্জন করেছে, তাদের হরেক রকমের পণ্য আছে। তারা কনগ্লোমারেট গড়ে তুলেছে। একটি গ্রুপের ব্যবসার অধীনে অনেক কোম্পানি।  হোল্ডিং কোম্পানি একটি, এটার অধীনে আছে আরো অনেক কোম্পানি। বলছিলাম ব্যালান্সশিট বা স্থিতিপত্রের কথা। কোনো কোম্পানি কয়েক পৃষ্ঠার স্থিতিপত্র উপস্থাপন করে কাজ শেষ করতে চায়। তারা তাদের অন্য শেয়ারহোল্ডারদের বেশি জানাতে চায় না। বাংলাদেশে মালিকানাভেদে ব্যবসার ধরন হরেক রকম। অধিকাংশ ব্যবসা শুরু হয় সোল প্রোপ্রাইটরশিপ বা একক ব্যক্তির মালিকানার মাধ্যমে। ব্যবসা একটু বড় হলে কেউ কেউ প্রাইভেট লিমিটেড কোম্পানি করে পরিবারের অন্য সদস্য বা জানা-পরিচিত লোকদের অংশীদারিত্ব দেয়। তবে অংশীদারিত্বের প্রাইভেট লিমিটেড কোম্পানির মাধ্যমে ব্যবসা করার বড় অসুবিধা হলো— সময়ের বিবর্তনে অংশীদারদের মধ্যে সন্দেহ বাড়তে থাকে। একপর্যায়ে ঝগড়া থেকে মামলা-মোকদ্দমা শুরু হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত এ ধরনের অনেক ব্যবসা বন্ধ হয়ে যায়। বন্ধ না হলেও যার জোর আছে, তার হাতে ব্যবসা চলে যায়। অংশীদারি ব্যবসার অন্য অসুবিধা হলো কেউ চাইলেই তার অংশ বেচতে পারে না। ব্যবসার অন্য শরিকরা কিনতে রাজি হয় না, আবার বাইরের কারো কাছে বেচতে চাইলে বাধা সৃষ্টি করে। অংশীদারি ব্যবসা সফল হয়, যদি ওই ব্যবসাকে পাবলিক লিমিটেড কোম্পানিতে রূপান্তর করা যায়। সেজন্য কিছু শর্ত মানতে হয়, সেগুলো প্রচলিত কোম্পানি আইনে বর্ণিত আছে। তবে শুধু পাবলিক লিমিটেড কোম্পানি করেও অতটা লাভ পাওয়া যাবে না, যদি না ওই কোম্পানিকে পাবলিক ইস্যুতে আনা না যায়। পাবলিক ইস্যু হলো জনগণের কাছে কোম্পানির ইকুইটি ক্যাপিটালের একটা অংশ বিক্রি করা। এটা করতে হলে রেগুলেটর বিএসইসির অনুমতি নিতে হবে। অনুমতি পাওয়া কোম্পানি আইপিও বিক্রি করে অন্য বিনিয়োগকারীদের কাছ থেকে ব্যবসা বৃদ্ধির জন্য অর্থ সংগ্রহ করে। এক্ষেত্রে বাংলাদেশের অভিজ্ঞতা ভালো নয়। এখানেও ফাঁকিটা দেয়া হয় যারা ইকুইটি বা শেয়ার কেনে, তাদের। অতি মূল্যায়ন করে শেয়ার বিক্রি করা হয় এবং শেষ পর্যন্ত অনেক উদ্যোক্তা আইপিও বা প্রাথমিক গণপ্রস্তাবের মাধ্যমে বাজার থেকে যে অর্থ সংগ্রহ করে, সেই অর্থও ব্যবসার কাজে লাগায় না। এমন বহু উদ্যোক্তা আছে, যারা আইপিও বিক্রি করে অর্থ নিয়ে ব্যবসা না করে দৃশ্যপট থেকে উধাও হয়ে গেছে। রেগুলেটর বিএসইসি কিছুই করেনি। আইপিও ইস্যু করার আগে শর্ত মানার জন্য ঋণখেলাপির তালিকা থেকে নাম কাটানোর ব্যবস্থা করেছে। কিন্তু আইপিও বিক্রি শেষ হওয়ার কয়েক বছরের মধ্যে ওই কোম্পানি ব্যাংকের কাছে পুনরায় ঋণখেলাপি হয়েছে। শুধু তাই নয়, প্রতারণার বিচিত্র কৌশল অনেক উদ্যোক্তা গ্রহণ করে। প্রথমেই অতিমূল্যায়িত করে শেয়ার বেচেছে ৩০ শতাংশ। মাত্র দুই বছরের মধ্যে উদ্যোক্তা সাহেব বাকি ৭০ শতাংশ থেকে আরো ৪০ শতাংশ শেয়ার বিক্রি করে দিয়েছে। বিক্রি করেছে বেশ বড় দামে। ম্যানুপুলেটেড বাজারে শেয়ার বিক্রি করে উদ্যোক্তা শতকোটি টাকা নিয়ে গেছে, যে অর্থ হয়ে গেছে তার একান্তই ব্যক্তিগত। বাইরের বিনিয়োগকারীদের কাছে যখন ৭০ শতাংশ শেয়ার চলে যায়, তখনো উদ্যোক্তা কিন্তু ম্যানেজমেন্টে বসে আছে। কারণ হলো তাকে চ্যালেঞ্জ করার কেউ নেই। তাই সে মাইনরিটি শেয়ার হোল্ডিং করেও কোম্পানির ম্যানেজমেন্টে বসে আরামে বেতন-ভাতা-পরিবহন-চিকিৎসা সুবিধা সবই নিচ্ছে। তবে শেষ পর্যন্ত যা দাঁড়ায়, তা হলো ওই কোম্পানির ব্যবসা সামনে আর এগোয় না। উদ্যোক্তা বা ম্যানেজমেন্টে যারা বসে আছে, তারা কোম্পানিকে ভালোভাবে চালানোর তাগিদ বা প্রয়োজন অনুভব করে না। ভালো মুনাফা দেয়া ওই কোম্পানির ম্যানেজমেন্টের চিন্তায় আসে না। অতি অল্প সময়ে চড়া মূল্যে ৭০ শতাংশ শেয়ার বিক্রি করে উদ্যোক্তারা অভাবনীয় ধনী হয়েছে। কিন্তু সত্য হলো, সেই কোম্পানির শেয়ার যারা বাজার থেকে কিনেছে, তারাই ফতুর হয়ে গেছে। অনেকের কাছে আইপিও বিক্রি করে অতি অল্প সময়ে ধনী হওয়া এখন একটা কৌশল মাত্র। বিএসইসিকে বলেছিলাম, উদ্যোক্তাদের শেয়ার বিক্রি করার ওপর কমপক্ষে তিন বছরের একটা লক ইন দেয়া হোক। বিএসইসি শোনেনি। অথচ বিএসইসিকে সৃষ্টিই করা হয়েছে সাধারণ বিনিয়োগকারীদের স্বার্থ রক্ষার জন্য। বাংলাদেশের শেয়ারবাজারের ওপর কিছুটা হলেও আস্থা ধরে রাখতে হলে উদ্যোক্তাদের শেয়ার বিক্রি বন্ধ করতে হবে। গত পাঁচ বছরে যেসব কোম্পানি আইপিও বাজারে এসেছে, সেগুলোর শেয়ারহোল্ডিং স্ট্রাকচার দেখলে দেখা যাবে উদ্যোক্তাদের খুবই সামান্য শেয়ার আছে। তারা শেয়ার বেচে অর্থ ব্যক্তিগত তহবিলে জমা করেছে। অন্যদিকে লোকসান দেখিয়ে মুনাফা বণ্টনের অবস্থান থেকে তারা সরে গেছে।

এতে সরকারও ট্যাক্স পায় না। আর যারা ওই ব্যবসার পুঁজির জোগান দিয়েছে, তারা বঞ্চিতই থেকে যায়। এ ধরনের ঠকবাজ উদ্যোক্তারা শেয়ারবাজারকে একটা অন টাইম সুযোগ হিসেবে গ্রহণ করেছে ধনী হওয়ার জন্য। তারা মনে করে, ব্যবসা করে সরকারকে ট্যাক্স দিয়ে, কথিত বিনিয়োগকারীদের মুনাফা দিয়ে কী লাভ। তারা ধনী হতে পেরেছে, উদ্দেশ্য তো অর্জিত হয়েছে। এখন কে, কী বলল, সেটা কে কেয়ার করে। আফটারঅল সমাজে ধনী লোকদের তো একটা মূল্য আছে। কে খবর নেবে সম্পদটা কীভাবে এসেছে! তারাই নিজেদের চালাক মনে করে আর সমাজের অন্যদের বোকা মনে করে। এদের প্রতারণা অনেকটা আইন মেনেই সাধিত হচ্ছে, শুধু আইন সুষ্ঠুভাবে প্রয়োগ না করার কারণে। রেগুলেটর বিএসইসি উল্টো দিকে ফিরে আছে বলে। কোম্পানির ব্যালান্সশিট কিছু যোগ-বিয়োগের পরিসংখ্যান মাত্র। এ ব্যালান্সশিটে তিনটি অংশ থাকে। এক. অ্যাসেট-লায়াবিলিটি, দুই. আয়-ব্যয়, তিন. ব্যবসায় ক্যাশ ফ্লো। এ তিনটি অংশকে স্টেটমেন্ট হিসেবে দেখানো হয় এবং রেগুলেটরি শর্ত মেনে এ ব্যালান্সশিটে স্বাক্ষর করতে হয় ব্যবস্থাপনা পরিচালক, একজন পরিচালক, প্রধান অর্থ অফিসার বা সিএফও, কোম্পানি সেক্রেটারি এবং সবার পরে সই করতে হয় অডিটরকে। তিন অংশের ব্যালান্সশিটের দুই অংশ এদের কর্তৃক সই হতে হবে। এ দুই অংশ হলো স্টেটমেন্ট অব ফিন্যান্সিয়াল পজিশন এবং স্টেটমেন্ট অব প্রফিট অ্যান্ড লস অ্যাকাউন্ট। তবে ব্যালান্সশিটে দেয়া পরিসংখ্যানগুলো নিজ থেকে অতটা বোঝা যাবে না। এগুলোর অনেকটা পরিষ্কার ধারণা পাওয়া যায় নোটস টু অ্যাকাউন্ট পড়লে। যারা জানতে চায়, তারা নোটস টু অ্যাকাউন্ট পড়ে নেয়। ব্যালান্সশিট গুরুত্বপূর্ণ তো বটেই। তবে কোম্পানি সম্পর্কে জানতে হলে পুরো অ্যানুয়াল রিপোর্ট বা বার্ষিক প্রতিবেদন পড়তে হয়। এ প্রতিবেদনে চেয়ারম্যান ও পরিচালকদের রিপোর্ট দেয়া এখন রেগুলেটরি শর্ত। ভালো কোম্পানির ম্যানেজমেন্ট সাধারণ শেয়ারহোল্ডারদের অনেক কিছু জানাতে চায়। মন্দ কোম্পানি হলে তথ্য দিতে চায় না, শুধু তত্ত্বীয়ভাবে রেগুলেটরের নির্দেশনা মেনে চলে। দুঃখজনক হলেও সত্য, কোম্পানির এজিএম বলতে যা বোঝায়, তা এখন অনুপস্থিত। শেয়ারহোল্ডাররা এজিএমে যেতে চায় না। কিছু লোক উপস্থিত থাকে অতি তাড়াতাড়ি এজিএমের এজেন্ডাগুলো পাস করানোর জন্য। ফলে কোম্পানির ম্যানেজমেন্টকে কোনো জবাবদিহির সম্মুখীন হতে হয় না। শেয়ারহোল্ডারদের বার্ষিক মিটিং হয়ে পড়েছে শুধুই নিয়ম রক্ষার একটি ইভেন্ট। অনেক কোম্পানিই প্রফিট বা মুনাফা কম দেখানোর জন্য পরিচালনা ব্যয়কে বাড়িয়ে দেখায়। এসব ব্যাপারে অনুসন্ধান করা সাধারণ বিনিয়োগকারীদের পক্ষে অসম্ভব। এক্ষেত্রে একমাত্র সহায়ক হতে পারে অডিটর, যিনি নিয়ম অনুযায়ী শেয়ারহোল্ডারদের ভোটে নির্বাচিত হওয়ার কথা। কিন্তু কোনো অডিটরই পুঙ্খানুপুঙ্খভাবে ব্যয়গুলোকে যাচাই করে না। ম্যানেজমেন্ট যে স্থিতিপত্র অডিটরের কাছে তুলে ধরে, সেটাই অধিকাংশ সময় অডিটর সই করে আসে। একটা অডিট কমিটি আছে বটে। তবে জানি না তারা ব্যয়ের ক্ষেত্রে সব প্রশ্ন তোলে কিনা। অন্যদিকে কিছু বহুজাতিক কোম্পানি ম্যানেজমেন্ট ফির নামে বিরাট অংকের অর্থ বাইরে নিয়ে যাচ্ছে। কোম্পানির পরিচালন ব্যয়ের মধ্যে এ কথিত ম্যানেজমেন্ট ফি অন্তর্ভুক্ত বলে শেষ পর্যন্ত সরকারও কম ট্যাক্স পায় এবং শেয়ারহোল্ডাররাও কম মুনাফা পায়। একটা বহুজাতিক কোম্পানি ম্যানেজমেন্ট ফি বাবদ বাইরে যে অর্থ নেয়ার প্রস্তাব রেখেছে, তা ওই কোম্পানির পরিশোধিত মূলধনের প্রায় সমান। এসব ব্যাপারে খোঁজ করার বা নেয়ার কেউ নেই বাংলাদেশে। কাদের অনুমোদনক্রমে এ বিশাল অংকের অর্থ বাইরে নেয়া হচ্ছে।

বাইরে যে সংস্থাকে ওই অর্থ পাঠানো হচ্ছে ম্যানেজমেন্ট ফি বাবদ, সেই ব্যবসা প্রতিষ্ঠানের মালিক বা সুবিধাভোগী কারা, অডিটর রিপোর্টে তার কিছুই উল্লেখ থাকে না। অডিটরকে এ ব্যাপারে বললে অডিটর বলে এসব তথ্য দিতে তারা বাধ্য নয়। তারা আরো বলে, শুধু বিএসইসি বললেই তারা এসব তথ্য দিতে পারে। কী ম্যানেজমেন্ট সার্ভিস বিদেশে অবস্থিত কোম্পানি বাংলাদেশে অবস্থিত বহুজাতিক কোম্পানিকে দিচ্ছে, তারও কোনো উল্লেখ নেই বার্ষিক প্রতিবেদনে। এ অবস্থায় সাধারণ বিনিয়োগকারী ওইসব পরিচালন ব্যয়ের ব্যাপারে অন্ধকারেই থেকে যায়। শেষ পর্যন্ত ক্ষতি হচ্ছে এ দেশের সরকারের এবং এ দেশের শেয়ারহোল্ডারদের।

পুরো ব্যালান্সশিট পড়তে ও বুঝতে হলে প্রফেশনাল জ্ঞান লাগে, যেটা আমার নেই। আমাদের দেশে পাস করা এবং সনদপ্রাপ্ত অ্যাকাউন্ট্যান্টদের এক্ষেত্রে প্রফেশনাল মনে করা হয়। তারা হয়তো বুঝতে পারবে উপস্থাপিত ব্যালান্সশিট এবং তাতে দেয়া পরিসংখ্যানগুলোর ব্যাখ্যায় কোথায় ত্রুটি আছে। আমাদের মতো নন-প্রফেশনালদের পক্ষে অডিটেড ব্যালান্সশিট পড়ে ফাঁকির জায়গাগুলোকে আবিষ্কার করা প্রায় অসম্ভব। বিএসইসির উচিত অন্তত রয়্যালটি, ব্যবস্থাপনা ফি, লাইসেন্স ফি বাবদ কোনো কোম্পানি বাইরে যদি অর্থ নিতে চায়, তাহলে বার্ষিক প্রতিবেদনে কোন কর্তৃপক্ষের অনুমোদনক্রমে এবং কোন হিসাবের ভিত্তিতে এবং বাইরের সুবিধাভোগী কারা, এসব তথ্য উল্লেখ করে প্রতিবেদন দিতে বাধ্য করা। এসব ক্ষেত্রে জবাবদিহি ও স্বচ্ছতা প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে না পারলে বাংলাদেশ থেকে বড় অংকের অর্থ এক ধরনের মানি লন্ডারিংয়ের মাধ্যমে বিদেশে চলে যাবে।

 

লেখক: অর্থনীতিবিদ; অনারারি অধ্যাপক অর্থনীতি বিভাগ, ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়


12
ICAS is the oldest professional body of chartered accountants in the world
https://www.icas.com/ca-today-news/ten-facts-for-international-accounting-day

ICAS was founded in 1854 by Royal Charter, making it the oldest professional body of chartered accountants. ICAS originated from the Edinburgh Society of Accountants, the Glasgow Institute of Accountants and Actuaries, and the Aberdeen Society of Accountants.

13
7 fun facts on bookkeeping: why accounting can be cool
https://www.arbitrue.com/blog/7-fun-facts-bookkeeping-accounting-can-cool/

1. “Bookkeeping” is the only English word to contain three sets of double letters back-to-back-to-back
Aside from bookkeeping (and derivations of this word), can you think of any other words in the English language with three sets of double letters?

To put you out of your misery, the answer is: no, you can’t.

Bookkeeper is the only proper noun in the English dictionary that holds this unique property of having three sets of letters one after the other. If we allow for hyphens, “sweet-tooth” is another word that has three doubles back-to-back-to-back. Some place names also have many doubles in their names, for example, check out Woolloomooloo in Australia – now that’s a mouthful!

2. FBI Accountants were the ones to bring down Al Capone
If you don’t think accounting and bookkeeping can be thrilling, then you haven’t heard the story of Al Capone! Capone was a well known American mobster and crime boss, although it wasn’t because of his gangster antics that he was arrested; the crime boss was ultimately arrested and convicted for income tax evasion, brought down by FBI accountants in 1931. According to NASBA, some 2,000 accounting special agents are employed by the FBI.

3. A team of CPAs count ballots for the Oscars
Other than doing the accounts, not many would expect to find the talents of bookkeepers being used in the world of showbiz. Yet the Academy Awards Night, hosted yearly to award the biggest names in the American film industry, holds a cool secret: a team of CPAs is in charge of counting out the ballots. Oscar voting has been counted in this way since 1935 and the CPAs are the only ones who know the results before the winners are announced.

4. The words “debits” and “credits” come from the latin words “debitum” and “creditum”
When you’re doing your double-entry accounting, you can’t escape the words “debit” and “credit”. But do you know where this terminology originates?

These words are a nod to the Italian mathematician Luca Pacioli, often referred to the “Father of Accounting”. The word “debit” comes from “debitum” in Latin, meaning “what is due”. Likewise, “credit” comes from “creditum” meaning “something entrusted to another or a loan”.

5. Bubble-Gum inventor, Walter Diemer, was an accountant
Yes, that’s right – before he accidentally invented the super stretchy, pink chewing gum that we all know and love, Walter Diemer worked as the accountant for the Fleer Chewing Gum Company, where bubble gum was first made. Ever since inventing it in 1928, people from all over the world, of all ages, have enjoyed this accountant’s sweet and chewy creation.

6. The co-founder of Nike is an accountant
Before starting the iconic Nike Inc., Phil Knight was a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and worked as an accountant in Portland, Oregon. While studying at Stanford, Knight founded the sports company as part of his MBA course, dedicating all his efforts to the new company after he graduated.

7. The first recorded name in history belonged to an accountant
Nestled within the popular non-fiction bestseller “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind” by Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, is an interesting fact: the first ever recorded name belonged to an accountant, and that name was ‘Kushim.’

Harari notes that as people started settling down into larger kingdoms, recording mathematical data became a necessity for these societies to function. Taxes, incomes, and possessions were all vital figures that needed to be recorded by bookkeepers, accountants and administrators.

The first written text in history, made some 5,000 years ago, is believed to belong to an accountant who was making records of supplies. It read something along these lines: “A total of 29,086 measures of barley were received over the course of 37 months. Signed, Kushim.”


14
Chinese baby born four years after parents' death
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-43724395?ocid


A baby has been born in China to a surrogate mother four years after his parents died in a car crash, Chinese media reported.

The couple, who died in 2013, had frozen several embryos hoping to have a child through IVF.

After the accident, their parents fought a protracted legal battle to be allowed to use the embryos.

The boy was born in December to a surrogate from Laos and The Beijing News first reported the case this week.

The newspaper explained how the lack of precedent for a case of this kind had forced the deceased couple's parents through a legal minefield before the surrogacy could proceed.

No precedent
At the time of the accident, the embryos were stored safely in a Nanjing hospital, frozen at minus 196 degrees in a liquid nitrogen tank.

A court battle gave the four grandparents-to-be the right over the fertilised eggs.

There was no precedent as to whether they could inherit their children's frozen embryos, according to reports.
They were eventually granted the embryos, but it wasn't long until the next problem occurred. The embryos could only be taken from the Nanjing hospital if there was proof that another hospital would store them.

But given the legal uncertainty around untransplanted embryos, it was hard to find another medical institution in China willing to get involved.

And with surrogacy illegal in China, the only realistic option was to look beyond the country's borders.

Proving paternity and nationality
Eventually, the future grandparents worked with a surrogacy agency and decided on Laos, where commercial surrogacy was legal.

As no airline was willing to accept a thermos-sized bottle of liquid nitrogen, the precious cargo had to be transported by car.

In Laos, the embryo was implanted into the womb of the surrogate mother and in December 2017 the boy was born.

Citizenship of the child, named Tiantian, was another problem though and so he was born not in Laos but in China - with the surrogate travelling there on a simple tourist visa.

With no parents left to prove paternity, all four grandparents had to give blood and take DNA tests to establish that the baby was indeed their grandson and that both parents had been Chinese nationals.

15
Coffee Drinkers Need Cancer Warning, Judge Rules, Giving Sellers the Jitters
By TIFFANY HSU, MARCH 30, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/business/coffee-cancer-warning.html

Coffee sellers are mulling how to fight a California judge’s ruling that would require the beverage to be branded with cancer warning labels.

The National Coffee Association, whose members include Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts, said in a statement on Thursday that it was “currently considering all of its options, including potential appeals and further legal actions.”

The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed in 2010 by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics, a nonprofit group based in Long Beach. The group charged that Starbucks and other companies — a group that eventually included 91 defendants — did not warn consumers that ingesting coffee would expose them to acrylamide, a chemical formed when coffee beans are roasted.

California keeps a list of chemicals it considers to cause cancer or reproductive harm, and acrylamide has been included since 1990. The state’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, known as Proposition 65 after it was passed in 1986, requires businesses to provide warning labels when exposing consumers to any of the hundreds of chemicals listed.

Judge Elihu M. Berle, in Los Angeles County Superior Court, wrote in a proposed decision on Wednesday that the companies failed to show that acrylamide does not pose a significant risk when produced during roasting.

“Since defendants failed to prove that coffee confers any human health benefits, defendants have failed to satisfy their burden of proving that sound considerations of public health support an alternate risk level for acrylamide in coffee,” the judge wrote.

More than 3.4 billion pounds of coffee was consumed in the United States between October 2016 and September 2017, more than in the entirety of South America, according to the International Coffee Organization.

William Murray, chief executive of the coffee association, wrote in an email on Friday that the presence of acrylamide in coffee “is not in doubt” but emphasized that the levels “are minuscule.”

“Coffee is much more than acrylamide — it literally contains hundreds of substances, and is one of the most heavily studied foods of all time,” he said.

Putting warning labels on coffee would be “simply confusing and misleading,” he said, citing statements from the World Health Organization that the drink does not cause cancer and studies showing that coffee offers health benefits like longevity.

“Coffee has been shown, over and over again, to be a healthy beverage,” he said in a statement.

Starbucks and other defendants can file objections to the proposed decision within the next two weeks. “You should expect that this matter will not be definitely settled in the courts for months to come,” Mr. Murray wrote.

Businesses that violate Proposition 65 could face penalties of up to $2,500 per day for each violation, according to the California attorney general’s office. Some companies have already settled.

In a court document filed in December, 7-Eleven agreed to post signs in its company and franchise stores and to pay $900,000 to cover civil penalties and the plaintiff’s legal costs.

The National Cancer Institute notes that, among foods, coffee is a major source of acrylamide, along with potato chips, bread, breakfast cereals and canned black olives. But the government agency also mentions on its website that acrylamide levels in food vary widely and that “people are exposed to substantially more acrylamide from tobacco smoke than from food.”


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8