Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2

Author Topic: Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2  (Read 593 times)

Offline abduarif

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
  • Test
    • View Profile
Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2
« on: January 04, 2014, 10:27:44 AM »
Choosing ‘None of the Above’ in the fray

The Supreme Court of India, in its judgment dated September 27, 2013, in People’s Union for Civil Liberties and another v the Union of India and another, has directed the election commission to make necessary provision in the ballot papers/EVMs and provide a button for ‘None of the Above’ in EVMs so that the voters who come to the polling booth, and decide not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray, are able to exercise their right not to vote while maintaining their right of secrecy.

In accordance with the order of the Supreme Court “None of the Above” shall be printed in a separate panel on the ballot paper below the name of the last contesting candidate. This ballot paper shall be affixed on the ballot unit of the EVM. If the voter presses the button next to “None of the Above” his desire not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray will get recorded in the EVM in secrecy.

Commission shall also make appropriate changes in Part-2 of Form 17C used during counting and the result sheet in Form 20 to separately compile the number of persons who used the option not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray. Election Commission of India shall issue detailed instructions to ensure compliance with the order of the court as expeditiously as possible.

Source: http://www.dhakatribune.com/law-amp-rights/2014/jan/02/landmark-judicial-decisions-election-disputes#sthash.yTLJowX3.dpuf
Abdullah Al Arif
Lecturer
Department of Law
Daffodil International University
Dhaka, Bangladesh

Offline Ferdousi Begum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 821
  • Don't give up.
    • View Profile
Re: Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2014, 01:19:39 PM »
"not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray"- such a provision was there in 9th National Election in BD, as far as I knew. (I gave no vote, that's why...  ;) )

Offline abduarif

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 251
  • Test
    • View Profile
Re: Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2014, 04:38:09 PM »
Yap, you are right. it was there. But this time it was removed from the fray.
Abdullah Al Arif
Lecturer
Department of Law
Daffodil International University
Dhaka, Bangladesh

Offline Ferdousi Begum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 821
  • Don't give up.
    • View Profile
Re: Landmark Judicial decisions on election disputes 2
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2014, 06:30:14 PM »
It should be added.  :(