Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mahmudul_ns

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
121
As the time frame for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) draws to an end in December 2015, the  United Nations is about to adopt a new set of goals known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), under the theme of “Transforming the World”.

The process of drawing the new goals began with the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro (Rio+20) in June 2012. The Open Working Group, with representatives from 70 countries, was set to prepare the draft proposals while a series of “global conversations” were also conducted by the UN in different countries to identify the priority areas.

The 70th United Nations General Assembly went into session on September 15, 2015. The General Assembly will adopt the new set of development goals at the Sustainable Development Summit scheduled to be held from September 25-27. Developing nations are expected to frame policies based on SDGs and allocate funds in such a manner that by 2030 poverty can be eliminated.

In short, the 17 goals are : i) ending poverty; ii) ending hunger; iii) ensuring healthy lives; iv) education to all; v) gender equality; vi) ensuring clean water and sanitation for all; vii) access to energy; viii) ensuring full employment; ix) sustainable industrialisation; x) reducing inequality within and among nations; xi) safe human settlement; xii) ensuring sustainable production and consumption; xiii) combating climate change;  xiv) sustainable use of marine resources; xv) protecting terrestrial ecosystem; xvi) justice for all and accountable institutions; xvii) strengthening global partnership.

What is striking is that the new set of 17 goals has 169 targets while the eight MDGs had 21 targets. Many countries are doubtful about implementing so many goals with so many targets. It would be difficult for resource-poor nations to take up all the goals at the same time and follow up on their implementation. There is a belief that more goals mean more aid-money. Though this is fallacious, developing nations generally lobbied for more goals with the hope that they will get more money.

The most important element missing in the SDG discourse is the issue of funds. Who will finance it and what is the amount that will be needed over the next 15 years? According to estimates, to lift one billion people out of poverty (living on $1.25 per day), i.e. SDG 1, would cost around $65 billion each year for the next 15 years. The total amount of funds to make all 17 SDGs achievable would be between $2 and $3 trillion each year for the next 15 years. Evidently, developing countries will not be able to find such enormous funds from within their national incomes. The rich countries will have to help with official development assistance (ODA). SDGs will indeed be an expensive endeavour.   

Unfortunately, developed countries have been showing signs of aid-fatigue. Advanced economies may not be keen to dish out such enormous amounts every year. Only the Nordic countries and United Kingdom have lived up to the commitment to give 0.7 percent of their Gross National Income (GNI) as ODA. United States and other developed economies are still lagging far behind.
Tax revenues of a country play the most important role in development programmes. Almost two-thirds of the funding came from internal revenues of countries during the implementation of the MDGs. The remaining one-third was covered by ODA and private financial flows.

Tax evasion by multinational companies and big businesses is a major problem that many developing nations find difficult to curb. Global corporate tax regimes are even worse and are full of loopholes. Multinationals easily circumvent local tax regulations of developing countries where they operate. Besides, massive transfer of illegal funds from developing countries to banks in developed countries has stifled development efforts in many developing nations.

To address this particular missing link, the Third International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD3) was held in Addis Ababa from July 13-16, 2015. The conference in its resolution expressed hope that rich countries will live up to their commitment to allocate 0.7 percent of GNI as ODA. It hoped to reform the culture of tax abuse, clamp down on illegal funds transfer, reduce the burden of debt, and stamp out corruption. The conference concluded with participants expressing confidence that financing SDGs will not be a problem. Sadly, the reality is different.

Even if one assumes that the missing financial link has been bridged, can the developing world meet the 169 targets by 2030? Wars, unstable political situation, unequal social structures, diseases such as ebola and low economic development may not allow developing nations to initiate some of the SDGs. Moreover, the absence of democracy, human rights and justice in many developing nations are impediments to SDGs. Besides, climate change may be the biggest challenge to many developing countries. Coping with natural disasters may drain whatever limited resources they have, leaving the fulfilment of SDGs for a later date.

The underlying base of the SDGs is industrialisation, which will generate employment, thus income and consumption (Goal 12). Industrialisation is welcome, but it is not a benign solution, unless climate friendly technologies are invented.

Many experts have dismissed the SDGs as unsustainable. A close examination of the goals would reveal that they are lengthy and quite cumbersome. Some of the goals are vague and unrealistic, several are debatable. Monitoring 169 targets will certainly be difficult. Fewer focused goals would probably have been more realistic.

 
Mahmood Hasan
The writer is former Ambassador and Secretary.

122
they are rich by resources but not by mankind.

123
recent news and it is pleasure to know.

124
Bangladesh Civil Service-BCS / Re: At glance Bangladesh
« on: September 22, 2015, 08:57:47 AM »
thanks for sharing.

125
it will make unrest that particular person for a while but never be able to neglect the situation. wherever all we know - "kullu nafsin jayee katul maut". 

126
Teaching & Research Forum / Re: Presentation Skill
« on: September 21, 2015, 12:59:55 PM »
helpful to enjoy teaching. thanks again.

127
The prime minister of Bangladesh has warned David Cameron that he needs to do more to combat radicalism amid concerns that British jihadis are fuelling a rise in extremism in the world’s third most populous Muslim nation.

Security and intelligence experts in Dhaka says British jihadis are stoking an Islamist revival in Bangladesh, schooling a new generation of young religious radicals sympathetic to Isis.

Recruiters and extremist funding from Britain’s Bengali diaspora communities are encouraging locals to join the cause of international jihad, and the number of Bangladeshis involved in salafi groups is rising, the experts say.
“The British government should take more steps on the ground,” the Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina Wazed told the Guardian. “Jamaat [-e-Islami – Bangladesh’s leading Islamist party] has a strong influence in east London. That’s true. They are collecting money, they are sending money.”

The warnings come after the arrest in Dhaka last month of Touhidur Rahman, a British man of Bangladeshi origin, who is alleged by police to be the “mastermind” behind the machete murders of two secular bloggers by Islamists earlier this year.

Several other cases linking individuals from Britain’s Bengali population to extremist groups active in Bangladesh and elsewhere, including Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen (JMB), Islamic State and al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS), have come to light in recent months.

Most recently, it emerged that two of the three British citizens recruited by Isis and killed by British and US drone strikes in Syria last month – Ruhul Amin and Reyaad Khan – were of Bangladeshi origin.

Security analysts, intelligence specialists and former officials in Dhaka warn that Bangladesh, a severely impoverished, low-middle income country with about 160 million people, is increasingly ripe for radicalisation.
 Bangladesh’s prime minister, Sheikh Hasina Wazed: ‘The British government should take more steps on the ground.’ Photograph: Reuters
Although the number of domestic terror attacks has fallen, in part due to a government crackdown, Sunni Muslim Bangladesh is undergoing a fundamentalist revival akin to that in Pakistan and several Middle East countries, the analysts said, and the lull in terrorist activity could quickly be reversed.
“Isis has its eye on Bangladesh,” said an ex-army intelligence specialist, who like most of the people interviewed for this report asked not be identified.

“Unofficially, the number of Bangladeshis going to fight in Syria and Iraq is up to 30. Bangladesh is becoming a transit route to Isis from India. We also have growing numbers of Bangladeshi diaspora guys coming here from Britain to recruit,” the intelligence specialist said.

Fertile ground awaits the foreign visitors. “There are very strong pockets of fundamentalism throughout Bangladesh,” said the director of an NGO specialising in security issues. “Jamaat-e-Islami [JEI] has a lot of grassroots support.”

“There are very large numbers of young men who don’t have a job or any prospects. Their only experience is the madrasa [religious school] and the mosque. In rural areas they don’t even have access to social media.

“These people want to be used, so they are very easily manipulated. When Bengalis from the UK come in, they are very easy to lead. The jihadi recruiters are coming from London, from Germany, from the US. They are educated, they have been to university, so they are more sophisticated,” the director said.

“The lack of government services and political exclusion [JEI has been barred from standing in national elections] has created space for the fundamentalists. They tell people: come to the mosque, follow religious rules, bring your friends. It is all softly, softly … These kids will do whatever they’re told. Nobody asks any questions of religious leaders. If the leaders say ‘do it’, they do it.”

Britain and the US have backed the government’s hardline counter-terrorist stance, despite its negative impact on civil liberties. But Dhaka insiders say they are missing the bigger picture: the below-the-radar, large-scale radicalisation of younger generations.

Hasina defended her zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, which has provoked fierce criticism from human rights groups. She insisted the security situation in Bangladesh was under control.

We are fighting to maintain a secular society … If we lose we will become a centre of global jihadi terrorism
“[The fundamentalist groups] are trying, no doubt about it, and there are some people trying to encourage them, but we have controlled the situation,” she said.

But Hasina said closer international cooperation was necessary to stop the spread of radical ideas from the west to Bangladesh: “Certainly we want cooperation from all other countries so that they should be very careful that no illegal money or arms or terrorists should take any chance to create any problem to any other country.”

While JEI is regarded by Britain and the US as a moderate Islamist political party, others strongly disagree.

Shahriar Kabir, a Dhaka journalist and author, described Jamaat as “the godfather of all terrorism” and said it posed an existentialist threat to Bangladesh’s secular tradition.
“If the BNP [the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist party that is allied to JEI] wins the next election, Bangladesh will become Islamicised,” Kabir said. “Isis and al-Qaida are targeting Bangladesh. Jihadis are coming here from abroad, some from the UK. And money for the Islamists is coming from Islamic NGOs and individuals in Britain and Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

“We are fighting to maintain a secular society. But we are losing ground. If we lose we will become a centre of global jihadi terrorism,” Kabir said.

Jamaat-e-Islami’s connection to the Bangladeshi community in east London and other British cities is well-established. On its website, the East London mosque, a focal point for the community, states it is “not affiliated to or controlled by JEI” although it says it has hosted JEI speakers in the past.

One such speaker was the former leading Jamaat MP, Delwar Hossain Sayeedi, who was tried and sentenced to death in 2013 by a special war crimes tribunal set up by the Awami League government, which appears to view most JEI leaders as terrorists.

According to the Jewish-Muslim interfaith organisation, StandForPeace, “the East London mosque and the Islamic Forum of Europe are both leading Jamaat organisers in Britain. Both institutions heavily promote the writings of Syed Maududi, the founder of Jamaat Islamism, whose book, Let Us Be Muslims, tells followers: “You must strive to change the wrong basis of government, and seize all powers to rule.”

The British connection in the Bangladesh blogger murder cases is only one of several such links. Last year, Bangladeshi police arrested Samiun Rahman, a British man of Bangladeshi origin, on suspicion of recruiting for Isis in Dhaka and the north-eastern city of Sylhet.
In addition, several British Bangladeshis have reportedly been killed in Syria while fighting for Isis or other Islamist groups. In another well-publicised case, Mashudur Choudhury, from Portsmouth, was convicted of terror crimes linked to Syria last year. He belonged a group calling itself the “Britani Bangladesh Bad Boys”. The other four members of the group have since been killed.

Islamist organisations involved in, or benefiting from, Bangladesh’s fundamentalist revival include the JMB terror group, which is notorious for exploding 500 bombs in a single day in 2005.

JMB cells are reported to be increasingly active again. In July police said they had arrested eight JMB militants, including the group’s leader. They were accused of plotting “to kill important personalities of the state and free their leaders from jail”. Last October Indian security officials said they had uncovered a JMB plot to assassinate Hasina, after two members of the group were killed in an explosion while making bombs in the state of West Bengal, which borders Bangladesh.

The ex-army intelligence specialist said Bangladeshi Islamists also have links to AQIS, which is active in India, Pakistan and Myanmar, and to the anti-India, Pakistan-based group Lashkar-e-Taiba (Army of God).

LET was responsible for the 2001 terrorist attacks on the Indian parliament and the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Its aim is to establish a caliphate, or Islamic state, in southern Asia. Bangladeshi cities said to be particularly supportive of fundamentalist ideas include Satkhira and Khulna in the south-west and Sylhet.
The brains behind the Islamist revival in Bangladesh is Hizb ut-Tahrir, the non-violent, pan-Islamist political organisation that also operates in Britain and the US among other countries, the intelligence specialist said.

“Hizb is a hearts and minds organisation,” the specialist said. “It runs a very savvy information and communications operation. It is extremely active in Bangladesh, one reason for its success being Hasina’s creation of a political vacuum.

“Hizb want a caliphate. They want to be a province or a state of Isis. Hizb activists are middle class or upper middle class, they are university educated, they have a growing presence in Britain and the US, and they have a large female following, all wearing headscarves. In Bangladesh, they recruit the foot-soldiers.”

Advertisement

A veteran Dhaka politician offered a more personal perspective. His family recently experienced the fundamentalist shift in Bangladeshi society at first hand, he said.

“My nephew came back from college in the US. He’s having a great education, something I never had. So what’s the first thing he says? He says to me: ‘Why don’t you grow a beard?’”

Downing Street acknowledged the UK needed to do more to tackle extremism but pointed to the number of foreign Isis fighters from other countries.

David Cameron’s official spokeswoman said: “The PM … set out his thinking in a big speech before the summer. He does believe the government needs to be working with communities in a cross-country effort.

“Alongside that, in many of the bilaterals that he has had with other leaders he also talks to them about what more we can do to work together to look at the best ways to address radicalisation and extremism. When he was in south-east Asia that was one of the things he talked to them about.”

Asked whether there was concern about Britain being a hotbed of radicalisation that is influencing other countries, she said: “I don’t think I have seen particular evidence pointing to that. Clearly we have concerns about British foreign fighters going to fight for Isis.

“But when you look at the number of foreign fighters Isil are recruiting it illustrates the fact that many countries are facing this problem whether it is other European countries or Asian countries too.”

128
Bangladesh Civil Service-BCS / Re: Insignificant Improvement in CPI
« on: September 21, 2015, 12:38:30 PM »
though we are now the middle-income country.

129
Use of Forum / Re: Daffodil International University Forum (User Guideline)
« on: September 21, 2015, 12:02:16 PM »
necessary post for new comer in DIU forum. thanks again. :)

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]