Communicative Competence and Communication Task / Language Analysis
After selecting appropriate and achievable performance goals for the ESP course (see Graves,
“Formulating Goals and Objectivesâ€), the next step for the ESP program provider is to break
these large communication tasks down into their constituent parts in order to identify “learnable
and teachable units†(Graves 76) to include in learning (or “enablingâ€) objectives. There are two
particularly useful theoretical frameworks to assist in this process. The first is that of
communicative competence, the idea the goal of language acquisition is the ability to use
language correctly and appropriately to accomplish a communication goal (Hymes 1971; Canale
and Swain 1980; Savignon 1983, 1991). The second framework is that of the Communication
Task / Language Analysis (CT/LA), which uses the construct of communicative competence to
break down a communication task, identified through an ESP needs assessment, into its separate
areas of competency or skills. With this information, the ESP program provider can write
measurable enabling objectives for each performance goal.
Communicative Competence
The framework of communicative competence proposed by Canale and Swain (1980) provides a
useful guide for a subsequent Communication Task/Language Analysis. The ESP practitioner
must consider what competencies (linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic) are
involved to achieve communicative competence in each communication task.
The concept of communicative competence is composed of four inter-related competencies:
Linguistic competence refers to the mastery of the language code. This involves a knowledge of
word and sentence formation (grammatical or syntactic structures), vocabulary, pronunciation,
intonation and spelling needed to perform a specific communication task.
For example, certain grammatical structures are representative of a business negotiation.
Effective negotiators need to be skilled during the early stages of a negotiation at asking open
questions, “Why/why not?â€, in order to get as much information as possible about the other
side’s interests or problems. Later, during the proposing stage of the negotiation, they need to be
adept at using hypothetical conditional “if†clauses to be able to explore and brainstorm options
without the fear of commitment.
Sociolinguistic competence involves mastering the sociocultural or pragmatic rules of language
that determine what is appropriate and acceptable, that is, how do you say what to whom in a
specific situation. This includes register. For example, an employee at the check-in desk of a
hotel might say, “How long will you be staying with us?†instead of “When are you leaving?â€;
and, “Would you please sign here?†or “And if you could just sign here,†instead of the more
blunt “Sign here.â€
Discourse competence refers to the mastery of rules that allow speakers to combine ideas in
sentences and paragraphs so that they make sense. What are the steps in taking a guest’s order for room service over the telephone? What goes at the beginning, the middle, or the end of a
sales letter or technical report within a specific organization or professional context? What is the
sequence of steps in a business negotiation or in scientific research article abstract?
Strategic competence relates to the rules that allow speakers to make up for language that they do
not have. This knowledge helps to compensate for breakdowns in communication and to
enhance communication, making it more effective. Included in strategic competence are
gestures, circumlocutions, code switching, and other language learning strategies.
The above text has been adapted by Westerfield from: Friedenberg, J., A. Lomperis, W. Martin, M.
van Naerssen, and K. Westerfield. Standards for Workplace Language Training: Guidelines for
Workplace Language Trainers. Unpublished manuscript.
Communication Task/Language Analysis: Handling Complaints
please see the attached file
I am following so ! and getting more advantages!
The above text has been adapted by Westerfield from: Friedenberg, J., A. Lomperis, W. Martin, M.
van Naerssen, and K. Westerfield. Standards for Workplace Language Training: Guidelines for
Workplace Language Trainers. Unpublished manuscript.