Recent Posts

71

Law of Bangladesh / Responsive police

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 27, 2025, 01:15:35 PM »

Responsive police

THE police station, as the frontline of law enforcement, serves as the primary point of contact between citizens and the police, often being the only accessible government institution for people in distress. Officers at this level are responsible not only for enforcing laws but also for addressing the immediate needs of individuals seeking assistance, making responsive policing essential for fostering trust, ensuring justice, and maintaining public order. Public perception of the police’s efficiency and fairness largely depends on their experiences at the station level, where timely justice, effective grievance redressal, and protection for vulnerable groups, including women, children, and marginalised communities, are crucial.

A responsive police force ensures that victims feel heard, conflicts are resolved promptly, and complaints are treated with urgency, thereby strengthening community trust and enhancing crime prevention. As first responders to crises — whether stemming from human actions, such as crimes, accidents, or civil disturbances, or from natural calamities like floods, earthquakes, or storms — police officers play a critical role in maintaining order, ensuring safety, and providing and facilitating aid. Their presence symbolises reassurance and reliability, reinforcing their role as essential public servants in times of distress.

Every police station has assigned an emergency officer to respond to any serious call. The officer is expected to respond to any emergency call. But duty officers in police stations of major cities in Bangladesh, frequently overwhelmed by administrative tasks, often have divided attention, which limits their focus on individual cases. This heavy workload contributes to delays, deprioritisation of cases, and frustration among victims, who may feel neglected and unsupported in their times of need.

Responsive policing in the digital age emphasises the ability of law enforcement agencies to quickly and effectively address citizen concerns received through modern communication platforms. With the widespread use of cell phones, social media, and dedicated digital portals, the police shall be better equipped to receive real-time information and respond promptly to emergencies, complaints, and queries. These platforms enable citizens to report incidents, request assistance, or seek information with ease, fostering a sense of transparency and accessibility. By integrating advanced technology such as GPS tracking, data analytics, and AI, alongside a commitment to round-the-clock monitoring, the police can ensure timely interventions and efficient service delivery. This approach not only enhances public trust but also empowers communities to actively engage in maintaining law and order.

Even though officers have access to official cellular communication facilities, they sometimes ignore calls from unknown numbers. In Bangladesh, the tendency of police officers to prioritise calls from known or influential individuals while disregarding those from unfamiliar numbers raises concerns about impartiality and equitable service delivery. Such practices erode public confidence in law enforcement by suggesting bias and preferential treatment rather than a commitment to justice and accountability. Every citizen, regardless of status or influence, deserves equal access to police assistance, and responses should be based on the urgency and gravity of the situation, not the caller’s identity. To foster trust and ensure fairness, it is crucial to establish and enforce strict protocols requiring equal attention to all calls, alongside comprehensive training to reinforce integrity and neutrality in policing.

A one-stop service in policing and law enforcement is a centralised approach that allows individuals to access various legal, policing, and victim support services in a single location or through a single point of contact. This model aims to improve efficiency, reduce stress for victims, and enhance collaboration among agencies such as police, legal aid, child protection, and social services. It focuses on a victim-centred approach, minimising re-traumatisation by reducing the need to repeatedly recount experiences, while technology integration ensures seamless case tracking and support. Examples include family justice centres for domestic violence victims, child protection units for abused children, and police service centres offering crime reporting, licensing, and community programmes. Benefits include improved accessibility, streamlined processes, victim empowerment, and stronger community trust, though challenges like resource allocation, inter-agency coordination, and data privacy must be addressed. Real-world examples, such as Singapore’s One-Stop Service Centres and South Africa’s Thuthuzela Care Centres, demonstrate the effectiveness of this model in providing holistic, compassionate, and efficient law enforcement services. The Bangladesh police have introduced initiatives such as service verification and police clearance certificates, which the public hopes will be expanded and implemented across other areas of police work.

Digital modernisation, such as online crime reporting, case tracking, and helplines like ‘999’, introduced and organised by the Bangladesh government, marks a significant step forward. Still, it requires expansion to meet the demands of an increasingly connected society. Predictive policing tools, real-time data access, and improved infrastructure can further enhance efficiency, enabling law enforcement to address contemporary challenges effectively. Citizens now envision a police service that integrates online platforms for crime reporting, even lodging of crime with the police, general diary filing, and easy access to information, paralleling the convenience of other digital services. While initiatives like the ‘999’ helpline demonstrate progress, a comprehensive approach to digital transformation is essential to align with evolving public expectations and maximise the potential of modernisation in fostering trust and efficiency.

Responsive policing is essential for building public trust, ensuring justice, and maintaining order. Police stations serve as the primary contact point for citizens, making their efficiency and fairness crucial. While digital tools like GPS tracking and real-time data can enhance police responsiveness, their full integration remains a challenge in Bangladesh. Issues such as selective responsiveness and administrative burdens hinder effective service delivery.

 addition to responsive policing, the police play a crucial role in crisis and emergency response by ensuring public safety, maintaining order, and providing immediate assistance during disasters, accidents, and security threats. Their responsibilities include rapid deployment to incident sites, crowd control, evacuation management, and coordination with other emergency services such as fire departments, medical teams, and disaster response agencies. Police officers assess risks, enforce laws, and take preventive measures to minimise harm while also offering critical support to affected individuals and communities. In cases of terrorist attacks, hostage situations, or violent conflicts, specialised police units intervene to neutralise threats and restore stability. Effective crisis and emergency response by the police requires strategic planning, advanced training, and seamless communication with relevant stakeholders to mitigate risks and protect lives.

When a road accident occurs, the police play a vital role in ensuring quick medical treatment for the injured. As first responders, they prioritise assessing the severity of injuries and immediately alerting emergency medical services to dispatch ambulances to the scene. Police officers often administer basic first aid if trained to do so, stabilising victims until professional medical help arrives. They also work to clear the way for ambulances by managing traffic, ensuring that delays are minimised. In cases where ambulances are delayed, police vehicles may transport critically injured individuals to the nearest hospital. Their swift and coordinated actions significantly enhance the chances of survival and recovery for accident victims.

In the event of arson or fire, the police play a crucial role in ensuring public safety, coordinating emergency responses, and investigating the cause of the incident. Their immediate priorities include securing the area, evacuating affected individuals, and assisting firefighters in managing the scene to prevent further harm. Police officers help establish perimeters to control access, ensuring that only authorised personnel are present. In cases of suspected arson, they work closely with fire investigators to collect evidence, interview witnesses, and identify potential suspects. By maintaining order and facilitating the swift flow of information between emergency services and the public, the police contribute significantly to minimising damage, protecting lives, and ensuring accountability for criminal actions.

The police play a crucial role in humanitarian assistance by ensuring safety, security, and order during emergencies and crises. In times of natural disasters, armed conflicts, or large-scale displacements, they facilitate the protection of vulnerable populations, including women, children, and the elderly, while maintaining public order. Police officers often collaborate with humanitarian organisations to provide logistical support, manage crowd control, and ensure the equitable distribution of aid. They also investigate incidents of exploitation, trafficking, or violence that may arise in humanitarian settings, thereby upholding the rule of law. By addressing both immediate and long-term security concerns, the police contribute significantly to the effective delivery of humanitarian aid and the restoration of stability in affected communities.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/263160/responsive-police

72

Law of Bangladesh / Accountability, ethics and commitment

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 27, 2025, 01:13:41 PM »

Accountability, ethics and commitment

Violent policing during a rally against civil service job reservation in Dhaka in July 2024. | Agence France-Presse/Abu Sufian Jewel

PEOPLE expect the police to have high ethical and moral standards. Personal lives of police officers often come under public scrutiny, with instances where families of officers interfere in police administration, sometimes for personal gain. This interference can lead to feelings of deprivation and disappointment within the force. The involvement of police officers’ families in administrative matters for personal gain, coupled with the exposure of scandalous activities on digital platforms in a few cases, poses serious challenges to the integrity and image of the police force. Such actions not only undermine internal morale by fostering frustration and resentment among officers but also erode public trust in law enforcement. Addressing these issues requires a robust code of conduct, stricter oversight, and effective measures to safeguard the professional and ethical standards of the police force.

People expect the police to uphold good conduct, but misconduct such as acrimonious behaviour, abusive language and general unprofessionalism undermines public trust and the integrity of law enforcement. Whether stemming from arrogance, disappointment or inadequate training, such actions escalate conflicts and create hostility between the police and the community. They demean individuals, foster resentment and weaken the legitimacy of the police force. To maintain public trust and cooperation, law enforcement must ensure rigorous accountability, continuous ethics training and a firm commitment to professionalism.

Etiquette and courtesy are fundamental to effective policing and the maintenance of public trust. Police officers are expected to demonstrate professionalism, respect and compassion in their interactions with all members of the community, regardless of circumstances. Polite and courteous communication, active listening and unbiased behaviour are essential traits that foster cooperation and mutual respect. Officers must exercise restraint and composure, even in challenging situations, to de-escalate conflicts and uphold the dignity of those they serve. By adhering to high standards of etiquette and courtesy, police officers not only enhance their credibility but also strengthen their role as protectors of justice and public order.

The police abuse of authority occurs when law enforcement officers exceed their lawful powers or misuse their position to exploit, intimidate or harm individuals or communities. This can take the form of excessive use of force, corruption, discrimination, wrongful arrests or unlawful surveillance. Such behaviour not only violates the rights of those affected but also erodes public trust in the police. Abuse of authority often disproportionately affects vulnerable or marginalised groups, exacerbating social inequalities and tensions. It is crucial to implement strong accountability mechanisms, ensure an independent oversight of police actions, promote a culture of integrity and respect for human rights within police forces to address this issue.

Professionalism and discipline are crucial for police officers to uphold public trust and ensure effective law enforcement. In Bangladesh, maintaining discipline within the police force is essential to prevent misconduct and ensure accountability. Officers must handle difficult situations calmly, communicate respectfully, and adhere to high ethical standards. As a constitutionally mandated disciplined force, the Bangladesh Police must follow a strict code of conduct and government regulations. Operating under a hierarchical structure, senior officers oversee subordinates, provide guidance and enforce disciplinary measures when necessary.

As the enforcers and guardians of the law, police officers must not only embody honesty but also cultivate trust by being perceived as ethical and just. A corruption-free police force fosters public confidence, ensuring that citizens feel protected rather than exploited. Ethical policing practices enhance the credibility of law enforcement and contribute to a fair and just society. However, reports of bribery and corruption involving police officers, frequently highlighted in the press, present a significant challenge to the integrity of law enforcement. While officers may publicly brush aside such allegations, the existence of corruption cases registered by the anti-corruption authority suggests a deeper systemic issue. This disconnect between public perceptions, media reports, and official denials undermines trust in the police force and weakens its credibility. To address this, law enforcement agencies must embrace transparency, fully cooperate with anti-corruption investigations, and implement rigorous internal accountability mechanisms. Only by implementing these measures can the police rebuild public trust and uphold the ethical standards they are expected to maintain.

Officers are expected to be honest in their statements. If they try to hide something, it can raise suspicion. In today’s digital age, very little remains hidden. Reports have emerged online about corruption and the accumulation of large sums of money involving some high-ranking police and civil service officers. These claims have often been dismissed by them as propaganda. It is challenging to deceive everyone, especially those engaged in investigative journalism. One police chief even wrote a book in which he claimed he promised his mother never to indulge in any form of corruption throughout his life. Such hypocritical statements erode trust in police officers and result in the stigmatisation of all officers. Through their connections with dubious elements of the ruling elite, these officers have reached the pinnacle of success while many highly professional officers have been relegated to less significant positions. This mirrors Gresham’s law in economics, where bad money drives out good, reflecting a dynamic where unethical practices overshadow integrity within the system.

Enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killing and crossfire incidents are significant human rights concerns associated with security forces and the police in many countries, including Bangladesh. These practices involve unlawful detention, targeted killing without due process and staged encounters often justified as self-defence or combating crimes. Victims of enforced disappearances are often detained secretly, with families left in anguish, unaware of their loved ones’ fate. Extrajudicial killings and crossfire incidents frequently occur under the pretext of maintaining law and order, bypassing judicial systems and eroding public trust. Such actions undermine the rule of law, violate international human rights standards and often lead to widespread fear and impunity. Advocacy for transparency, accountability, and legal reforms is critical to address these abuses and restore confidence in law enforcement agencies. The enforced disappearance committees formed under the interim government has revealed very shocking and alarming news of enforced disappearance involving a large number of people that affected their family and friends very adversely with the irreparable loss of their loved one. One incident, in Jhenidah, carried out by security forces, claimed the life of a man, whose father revealed it on social media. Stricken with profound grief and despair, the father, disillusioned by the prevailing criminal justice system, chose not to seek earthly justice. Instead, he entrusted the matter to the divine justice of the afterlife.

As guardians of law and order, the police must align their actions with principles of dignity, fairness, and legality, ensuring individuals’ rights to life, liberty and security while avoiding excessive force, arbitrary detention or discrimination. Their responsibilities include protecting people from violence and abuse, ensuring due process, and safeguarding freedoms such as speech and movement. Professional policing demands adherence to legal procedures, ethical treatment of all individuals irrespective of background and a commitment to de-escalation and non-violent conflict resolution. Integrating human rights education into training programmes, maintaining transparency and implementing oversight mechanisms reinforce accountability and strengthen public trust. By upholding these values, the police not only fulfil their legal duties but also sustain the foundational principles of a just and equitable society.

In democratic societies, the police are expected to be accountable to multiple internal and external bodies to prevent misuse of power and ensure they remain free from political interference or abuse. Independent civilian oversight bodies play a critical role in this accountability framework by investigating complaints of misconduct, reviewing the use of force, and making recommendations to improve policing practices. These mechanisms such as oversight boards, civilian review committees and accessible complaint-tracking systems promote transparency, fairness and impartiality in law enforcement. Persistent issues like bribery, extrajudicial killings, and case tampering underscore the need for robust oversight and reform. Public reporting of police activities and unbiased investigations are essential for maintaining credibility, ensuring justice, and demonstrating that the police are not above the law. By holding officers accountable and operating transparently, the police can rebuild public confidence, uphold the rule of law, and reinforce their role as trusted guardians of justice. In spite of the strong support and commitment from the police, the establishment of an independent oversight body remains stalled. As a result, the public stands to lose a crucial opportunity to benefit from a globally recognised mechanism that is essential for ensuring police accountability.

The use of body-worn cameras and other modern devices has been widely adopted in democratic policing as a tool to enhance transparency. Studies have shown that body cameras reduce the frequency of use-of-force incidents and complaints against officers, as they provide an objective record of interactions between police and citizens. Additionally, the presence of body cameras can improve both officers and citizens’ behaviour, as both parties are aware of being recorded.

Maintaining ethical standards, accountability, and transparency in policing is crucial for public trust and justice. While law enforcement officers are expected to uphold integrity and professionalism, issues such as corruption, abuse of power, and extrajudicial actions undermine credibility. Addressing these challenges requires strict codes of conduct, independent oversight and a culture of accountability. Ethics training, community engagement and modern tools like body-worn cameras can enhance transparency and reduce misconduct. Ultimately, a just and effective police force operates within the law, respects human rights, and ensures dignity and fairness for all, reinforcing its role as a trusted guardian of justice and public safety.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/263220/accountability-ethics-and-commitment

73

Law of Bangladesh / The police station: a service centre

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 24, 2025, 03:46:48 PM »

The police station: a service centre

| —New Age

THE police station, locally known as thana in South Asia, particularly in Bangladesh, serves as the fundamental unit of law enforcement. Rooted in the colonial administrative framework, the thana has evolved to adapt to the socio-political and cultural context of the region. In Bangladesh, the thana is both a geographical jurisdiction and a physical establishment that upholds public safety, enforces laws, and ensures community safety. Its significance lies in its accessibility, as it operates as the first point of contact between citizens and the law enforcement apparatus.

A thana is typically situated at the heart of a specific administrative area, often encompassing urban and rural regions. Each thana is headed by an officer-in-charge, who oversees a team of police personnel, including inspector (operation), inspector (investigation), sub-inspectors (SIs), assistant sub-inspectors (ASIs), and constables. The jurisdiction of a thana is well-defined, covering a cluster of neighbourhoods, villages, or wards, depending on the population density and geographic spread. The thana has police outposts, police boxes, and investigation centres to reach out to the people at the local level.

In its physical form, a thana is equipped with facilities for public service, administrative work, and detention. It houses rooms for receiving complaints, maintaining records, and coordinating operations, as well as temporary lock-up cells for suspects. The thana is at the forefront of maintaining law and order. Its primary functions include crime prevention, investigation, and community engagement. Citizens approach the thana to lodge First Information Reports and General Diary which initiate the legal process for criminal investigations. Police personnel investigate cases, collect evidence, and liaise with the judicial system to ensure the rule of law. Given its importance, police stations are fortified to ensure the safety of law enforcement personnel, sensitive case records, confiscated evidence, and detained individuals. Armed sentries are strategically positioned at entrances and key locations within the premises to safeguard not only the infrastructure but also the personnel and property housed within the station.

In addition to crime control, thanas are pivotal during emergencies, such as natural disasters, political unrest, or public demonstrations. Police stations also play a significant role in conflict resolution at the local level, often mediating disputes among community members. Furthermore, thanas are responsible for executing arrest warrants, maintaining records of habitual offenders, and ensuring public safety through regular patrolling. In rural areas, the police station often works in collaboration with local community leaders to uphold peace and resolve minor disputes.

One of the most crucial roles of a thana is to foster trust and collaboration with the local community. Modern policing increasingly emphasises community policing as a way to address crime and societal issues. By engaging with citizens, holding awareness campaigns, and responding promptly to complaints, thanas can build bridges of trust and transparency between law enforcement and the public. Due to the changing nature of crimes and the evolving demands and problems of the growing population, the functional capacity of police stations as law enforcement centres has increased significantly. Consequently, the number of police personnel assigned to police stations has also grown. Modern policing has introduced various new features in police stations, such as the formation of beat policing and community policing, the establishment of service reception desks, facilities for women and children, open house days, computer and IT services, separate waiting areas for men, women, and physically challenged individuals (Smart 4T), briefing rooms, and separate barracks for male and female officers.

While security is essential for protecting police stations against potential threats, stringent access control measures often create barriers for ordinary citizens seeking police assistance. The process of entering a police station is not always straightforward, particularly for marginalised individuals, those unfamiliar with police procedures, or those without personal connections within law enforcement. These restrictions, originally implemented for security purposes, are further reinforced by bureaucratic rigidity and remnants of colonial-era policing practices, which historically prioritised authority and control over community engagement and public service.

Since the Thana serves as the primary service delivery centre for law enforcement, modern police stations should not resemble fortified enclaves that impose undue restrictions on public access. Instead, security can be maintained without compromising accessibility by adopting a more citizen-friendly approach. Sentries should be trained to interact with visitors in a way that ensures safety while fostering an open and welcoming environment. Additionally, the deployment of advanced security technologies — such as biometric access systems, surveillance cameras with facial recognition, and automated entry points — can enhance protection while reducing the reliance on static personnel at entry and exit points. Creating designated public access zones within police stations, where individuals can seek help without unnecessary procedural hurdles, can further improve service delivery. Striking the right balance between security and public accessibility is crucial to fostering trust in law enforcement and ensuring that police stations remain approachable spaces for all citizens.

Although police stations are mandated to remain open and functional 24/7 to serve the public, the reality is that citizens frequently encounter obstacles when attempting to enter. The lack of clear guidelines on how to navigate the system, combined with a perceived sense of intimidation created by armed personnel and rigid protocols, can discourage people from seeking police assistance, even in urgent situations. In many instances, victims of crime, particularly those from vulnerable communities, may feel hesitant to approach the police station due to fear of harassment, discrimination, or being turned away without assistance.

The situation becomes even more complex in metropolitan areas like Dhaka, where high population density, frequent crime reports, and administrative inefficiencies contribute to longer wait times and increased difficulty in accessing police services. It is not uncommon for individuals to spend hours attempting to reach the duty officer, especially in larger police stations handling a high volume of cases. In such circumstances, the very institution designed to protect and assist citizens risks becoming an unapproachable fortress, further widening the gap between law enforcement and the communities they are meant to serve.

Furthermore, people expect basic amenities at police stations, such as a waiting area with seating, a dedicated corner for women and children, and access to drinking water. Clean and accessible police stations symbolise inclusivity and reinforce the perception of law enforcement as a public ally rather than an obstacle. Currently, many police stations lack even these essentials — often no chairs, restrooms, or private spaces — forcing victims to wait uncomfortably. This lack of facilities sends a clear, disheartening message: police stations are unwelcoming and only seem accessible to those with influence or financial means. Much like hospitals, where people receive care, police stations should be welcoming, safe spaces for those seeking support, as they deal with fundamental aspects of people’s lives—safety, life, and property. Police stations should serve as accessible and welcoming public spaces where every individual is treated with fairness and dignity.

Notably, many police stations, outposts, and investigation centres lack physical infrastructure altogether. In major cities, police often operate out of rented buildings that are neither designed for police work nor secure from potential criminal threats. Inadequate infrastructure severely hampers police effectiveness. Realistically, the police cannot solve every problem instantly — some cases are beyond their jurisdiction or lack sufficient evidence for immediate resolution. However, the public expects that the police will always act with due diligence and sincerity, exhausting every effort to uncover the truth and solve cases to the best of their ability. People often believe that the police have the power to do anything and everything. This myth and stereotype must be dispelled from the public’s mindset through active engagement and education.

In police parlance, the engagement of sources or agents by police for gathering information on crimes and criminals is a critical tool in modern law enforcement. These sources, often embedded within communities or criminal networks, provide valuable intelligence that aids in crime prevention and investigation. However, this practice is not without risks. Some sources may misuse their association with the police to further personal agendas, settle personal vendettas, or gain undue advantage in their social or professional circles. Such abuse of power can tarnish the credibility of police operations and create mistrust within the community. Therefore, it is imperative for law enforcement agencies to establish robust oversight mechanisms, enforce strict ethical guidelines, and maintain accountability to ensure that the engagement of sources is both effective and free from misuse. Proper vetting, regular monitoring, and a clear delineation of the source’s role can help mitigate these risks and uphold the integrity of police work.

In Bangladesh, unpaid brokers or touts often operate around police stations, offering to facilitate services for individuals seeking assistance. These intermediaries, usually with informal connections to police personnel, claim to expedite processes, secure favourable outcomes, or navigate bureaucratic hurdles for those unfamiliar with police procedures. While some may provide genuine guidance, many exploit vulnerable individuals by creating unnecessary complexities to showcase their utility, often demanding money in exchange for help. This practice not only burdens people financially and emotionally but also erodes trust in the police by fostering the perception that direct access to services is difficult without intermediaries. Additionally, interactions with police station sentries can sometimes be dismissive, reinforcing the notion that police stations are indifferent or even hostile, particularly toward those without social connections. To address this issue, police stations must be free from intermediaries, sentries should be more proactive in assisting visitors without compromising security, and greater transparency and accountability must be ensured to eliminate reliance on such informal agents.

One of the most significant obstacles to effective crime investigation is the lack of resources. Inadequate funding, insufficient forensic tools, and a shortage of qualified personnel hinder the police’s ability to conduct thorough investigations. The General Diary entries or complaints filed by citizens are crucial for ensuring justice and safety. However, investigating these matters often lacks any government-provided budget or vehicle allocation. Sub-inspectors or assistant sub-inspectors frequently rely on personal funds to hire CNGs or auto-rickshaws to visit incident sites. Depending on the distance, these rides cost between Tk 500 and Tk 1,000. On average, a rural police station handles 20-25 GDs or complaints monthly, making the cumulative expense significant. It is imperative for the government to allocate specific funds to cover these recurring investigation costs.

Government allocations for fuel allow patrol vehicles to operate for only 15-20 days a month. To sustain operations for the remaining days, SIs/ASIs must bear fuel costs out of pocket. After enduring sleepless nights on patrol duty, it is unreasonable to expect officers to spend Tk 500-1,000 from their limited salaries for fuel. It is necessary to ensure sufficient fuel allocation to support uninterrupted patrol services.

In rural police stations, there are typically only 2-3 government vehicles available for night patrols. These vehicles are overused, causing them to age rapidly and become unserviceable. For instance, a vehicle assigned to night patrol remains in continuous operation — after one team completes its shift, another team immediately takes over and uses the same vehicle for their duties. Due to the lack of additional vehicles, the limited fleet is subjected to excessive wear and tear, accelerating deterioration and reducing its operational lifespan.

However, to address the risks and demands of maintaining public safety, 5-7 patrol teams are often deployed. In such situations, local CNG vehicles are forcibly requisitioned, a practice that persists year-round. Unfortunately, there is no government provision for fuel, food, or fare for these drivers, leading to growing resentment towards the police. To prevent public dissatisfaction and ensure equitable treatment, it is necessary to allocate resources to cover these expenses.

Police stations frequently encounter unclaimed bodies within their jurisdictions. Many of these bodies are decomposed, requiring careful handling and inspection. The assistance of mortuary assistants (doms) is essential in such cases, but they must be paid, often along with food or other incentives. Additional costs include transporting the body to and from the hospital, conducting post-mortems, fingerprint collection, DNA profiling, publishing notices in newspapers, and burial. Officers bear these costs personally, as the investigation allowance is woefully inadequate compared to the expenses incurred. The government must ensure proper financial support to handle such cases.

Investigating cases demands significant financial resources. A standard case costs around Tk 5,000-7,000 to investigate, while complex cases such as robbery or rape can cost between Tk 20,000 and Tk 30,000. However, the investigation allowance provided by the government is limited to Tk 2,000-5,000. To ensure effective and thorough investigations, government funding should align with the actual costs involved.

Maintaining informants is critical for gathering intelligence and ensuring proactive policing. Each month, SIs/ASIs spend Tk 5,000-10,000 from their own salaries to support their sources. Unfortunately, there is no government provision for this essential expenditure. The authorities may introduce a source allowance to ease this burden on officers.

The process of arresting an accused, keeping them in custody, and presenting them in court involves expenses ranging from Tk 1,500 to 2,000 per case. Currently, there is no government allocation for these necessary expenses.

Basic office supplies such as chairs, tables, computers, printers, files, notebooks, pens, and other stationery are essential for daily operations. However, these items are not sufficiently provided, forcing them to purchase using personal funds. The government should provide sufficient resources to equip police stations with these essential supplies.

Community policing initiatives, public meetings, seminars, banners, festoons, and announcements via microphones are vital for fostering trust and cooperation between the police and the community. However, these activities are currently funded personally by officers. It is expected that the government shall allocate funds for these programmes to ensure their sustainability.

Effective communication is a cornerstone of efficient policing. Officers frequently use their personal mobile phones for official purposes, incurring significant expenses. The government should allocate a budget to cover communication costs to enable seamless operations.

The modernisation of police stations in Bangladesh is not merely an infrastructural upgrade but a fundamental shift towards a more effective, technology-driven, and community-focused policing model. Ensuring the successful implementation of these changes requires sustained investment, strategic planning, and collaboration between law enforcement agencies, policymakers, and the public. By prioritising these improvements, Bangladesh police can enhance its ability to maintain law and order, protect citizens, and respond to emerging security challenges in the 21st century.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/262987/the-police-station-a-service-centre

74

Economy / দেশে ধনীদের তালিকা হয় না কেন

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 24, 2025, 03:44:45 PM »

দেশে ধনীদের তালিকা হয় না কেন

বাংলাদেশে ধনীদের তালিকা করা হয় না। কারণ, এ দেশের ধনীদের সম্পদ কত, তাঁরা কত সম্পদ ভোগ করেন, এর প্রকৃত তথ্য জানার সুযোগ নেই বললেই চলে। এ ছাড়া সম্পদ বাড়ল না কমল—তা জানার সুযোগ কম। মূলত বড় বড় ধনী তাঁদের মালিকানাধীন প্রতিষ্ঠানকে শেয়ারবাজারে তালিকাভুক্ত করতে আগ্রহী নন। তাই সম্পদ বৃদ্ধি-কমার দৈনন্দিন হিসাব পাওয়া যায় না। এমনকি সম্পদ বিক্রি বা কেনার তথ্যও প্রকাশ্যে আসে না।

যুক্তরাষ্ট্র, সিঙ্গাপুরসহ বিশ্বের বিভিন্ন দেশে ধনীদের এ ধরনের তালিকা করা হয়। তা গণমাধ্যমেও আসে। বিশ্বের শীর্ষ ধনীর তালিকা প্রকাশের জন্য বিখ্যাত ফোর্বস সাময়িকী। সেখানে প্রতিনিয়তই ধনীদের হালনাগাদ অবস্থান দেখানো হয়। এ ছাড়া বিশ্বের বড় বড় শেয়ারবাজারের দরদামের ভিত্তিতেও ধনীদের সম্পদমূল্যের ওঠানামা করে।

কিন্তু বাংলাদেশে এমন কখনো হয়নি। ফলে গত এক দশকের বেশি সময় ধরে গুলশান-বনানীর মতো অভিজাত এলাকার বড় বড় ব্যবসায়ীদের টপকে পুরোনো ঢাকার জর্দা ব্যবসায়ী প্রয়াত কাউছ মিয়া দেশের সেরা করদাতার সম্মাননা পেয়ে এসেছেন। এ ছাড়া কোনো সরকারের আমলেই আলাদা করে ধনীদের তালিকা করার উদ্যোগ নেওয়া হয়নি। তবে জাতীয় রাজস্ব বোর্ড (এনবিআর) খাতভিত্তিক সেরা করদাতাদের সম্মাননা ও কর কার্ড দিয়ে থাকে। এ বছর অবশ্য সেরা করদাতাদের সম্মাননা দেয়নি।

এবার দেখা যাক, কেন বাংলাদেশের ধনীদের তালিকা তৈরি করা যায় না।

শেয়ারবাজারে তালিকাভুক্ত নয়

এ দেশের বড় ব্যবসায়ীদের প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলো সাধারণত শেয়ারবাজারে তালিকাভুক্ত হয় না। ফলে কোম্পানি মালিকেরা কী পরিমাণ অর্থ লভ্যাংশ পান, তা প্রকাশ্যে ঘোষণায় আসে না। ফলে তাঁদের আয় বা সম্পদের পরিমাণ জানা কঠিন হয়।

বড় বড় দেশীয় কোম্পানিগুলো যদি শেয়ারবাজারে তালিকাভুক্ত হতো, তাহলে সেগুলোর মালিক বা কোম্পানি পরিচালকদের সম্পদের পরিমাণ জানা যেত। কে কত টাকার মালিক তা–ও প্রকাশ্যে আসত।

বাড়ি-গাড়ি কোম্পানির নামে

এ দেশের বড় কোম্পানি বা প্রতিষ্ঠানের মালিক বা পরিচালকদের অনেকে কর ফাঁকি দিতে নিজেদের বাড়ি-গাড়ি নিজেদের নামে দেখান না। তাঁদের বাড়ি, গাড়ি, ফ্ল্যাট—সবই প্রতিষ্ঠানের নামে থাকে। প্রতিষ্ঠানের মালিক, পরিচালক বা বড় পদধারী হওয়ায় তাঁরা এসব সম্পদ ভোগ করেন বলে কাগজে-কলমে দেখানো হয়। এমনকি স্ত্রী-সন্তানের জন্য ব্যবহার করা গাড়িও প্রতিষ্ঠান দেয়। কাগজে-কলমে প্রতিষ্ঠানই এসব সম্পদ ব্যবহারের সুবিধা দেয়। ফলে ওই ধনী ব্যবসায়ীর কর নথিতে এসব সম্পদ দেখানো হয় না। এমনকি জীবনযাত্রার বিভিন্ন খাতের খরচও প্রতিষ্ঠান বহন করে। ফলে এই ব্যক্তির টাকাপয়সা বা সম্পদ কত তা জানা যায় না।

সম্পদ লুকিয়ে রাখার প্রবণতা

এ দেশে সম্পদ লুকিয়ে রাখেন একশ্রেণির মানুষ। কারণ, ঘুষ-দুর্নীতির টাকায় বাড়ি, গাড়ি, ফ্ল্যাট, প্লট কেনেন; কিন্তু কর নথিতে আয়ের উৎস দেখাতে পারেন না তাঁরা। তাই স্ত্রী-সন্তান, আত্মীয়স্বজনের নামে এসব সম্পদ দেখানো হয়।

তাই বিলাসবহুল জীবনযাপন করলেও এই শ্রেণিকে কখনোই ধনীদের কাতারে রাখতে পারেন না কর কর্মকর্তারা। ফলে আড়ালেই থাকেন তাঁরা; কিন্তু বিলাসী জীবন উপভোগ করে যান।

সম্পদমূল্যের মিথ্যা ঘোষণা

এ দেশে সম্পদের সঠিক মূল্যায়ন হয় না। জমি-ফ্ল্যাট কেনাবেচার সময় প্রকৃত মূল্য ঘোষণা দেন না ক্রেতা–বিক্রেতা কেউ। এ ছাড়া নির্ধারিত মৌজা মূল্যেই জমি কেনাবেচা হয়। বাজারমূল্যের চেয়ে মৌজা মূল্য অনেক কম থাকে। ফলে বাড়তি টাকার লেনদেনের হিসাব থাকে না। যা কালোটাকা হয়ে যায় এবং কর নথিতে দেখানো হয় না।

এ ছাড়া কর নথিতে প্রতিবছর সম্পদের মূল্য কেনা দামকে দেখানো হয়। যেমন কোনো করদাতা সত্তরের দশকে যদি এক লাখ টাকায় জমি কেনেন, এখনো কর নথিতে ওই জমির দাম এক লাখ টাকাই থাকবে। অথচ সেই জমির বাজারমূল্য এখন এক কোটি টাকা হয়ে গেছে; কিন্তু কর নথিতে ওই করদাতা মাত্র এক লাখ টাকার সম্পদের মালিক।

এভাবে সম্পদের বাজারমূল্য বিবেচনায় না আনায় ধনীদের চিহ্নিত করার অন্যতম প্রধান সমস্যা।

এনবিআরের সক্ষমতার অভাব

কোন করদাতা কত সম্পদের মালিক, কিংবা কার কত আয়-তা প্রকৃত অর্থে খুঁজে বের করার সক্ষমতাও কম জাতীয় রাজস্ব বোর্ডের (এনবিআর)। বর্তমানে ১ কোটি ১০ লাখের বেশি কর শনাক্তকরণ নম্বরধারী (টিআইএন) আছেন। তাঁদের মধ্যে ৪০ লাখের বেশি প্রতিবছর রিটার্ন জমা দেন।

কিন্তু এনবিআরের আয়কর বিভাগের সীমিত জনবল দিয়ে বিশালসংখ্যক রিটার্ন দেওয়া করদাতাদের কর নথি পর্যালোচনা করা কঠিন। ফলে এনবিআরের আয়কর বিভাগ যারা নিয়মিত করদাতা, তাঁদের কাছেই বেশি যায়।

সারচার্জ দেন মাত্র ১৫ হাজার করদাতা

বর্তমানে চার কোটি টাকার বেশি সম্পদধারীর প্রদত্ত আয়করের ওপর সারচার্জ দিতে হয়। এনবিআরের সর্বশেষ হিসাবে, ২০২১-২২ অর্থবছরে মাত্র ১৪ হাজার ৮৫৪ জন করদাতা সারচার্জ দিয়েছেন। এতে এনবিআরের প্রাপ্তি মাত্র ৬২৬ কোটি টাকা। তখন অবশ্য তিন কোটি টাকার বেশি সম্পদ থাকলে সারচার্জ দিতে হতো। এনবিআরের ভাষায়, সারচার্জ দেওয়া করদাতারাই দেশের অতিধনী।

সেই হিসাবে, প্রায় ১৭ কোটি জনসংখ্যার দেশে সারচার্জ দেওয়া ‘অতিধনী’ করদাতার সংখ্যা ১৫ হাজার ছাড়ায়নি।

Source: https://www.prothomalo.com/business/09b0d7xqtf

75

Articles and Write up / কারিগরি শিক্ষার্থীদের দাবি কী, পূরণে বাধা কোথায়, কী চিন্তা করছে সরকার

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 22, 2025, 11:49:23 AM »

কারিগরি শিক্ষার্থীদের দাবি কী, পূরণে বাধা কোথায়, কী চিন্তা করছে সরকার

ছয় দফা দাবিতে কারিগরি শিক্ষার্থীদের আন্দোলনফাইল ছবি: দীপু মালাকার

কারিগরি শিক্ষার্থীরা দীর্ঘদিন ধরেই আন্দোলন করছেন। ১৬ এপ্রিল সাতরাস্তায় তাঁদের অবস্থান কর্মসূচিতে রাজধানীজুড়ে যানজট তৈরি হয়। ঢাকার বাইরেও জেলায় জেলায় আন্দোলন হচ্ছে।

আন্দোলনকারীরা মূলত ছয়টি দাবি তুলেছেন। যদিও তাঁদের সঙ্গে কথা বলে জানা গেছে, আন্দোলনের সূত্রপাত মূলত ‘ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর’ থেকে ‘জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর’ পদে পদোন্নতি বিষয়ে উচ্চ আদালতের আদেশকে কেন্দ্র করে।

পদন্নোতির বিধান না থাকায় কারিগরি শিক্ষা অধিদপ্তর ও অধিদপ্তরের অধীন প্রতিষ্ঠানগুলোতে ক্যাডারবহির্ভূত গেজেটেড ও নন-গেজেটেড কর্মকর্তা-কর্মচারী নিয়োগ বিধিমালা ২০২০-এর দুটি সিরিয়াল (২৭ ও ২৮) চ্যালেঞ্জ করে গত বছর ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর মো. আশিক মিয়াসহ কয়েকজন হাইকোর্টে রিট করেন। প্রাথমিক শুনানি নিয়ে আদালত রুল দেন। রুলের ওপর চূড়ান্ত শুনানি শেষে গত ১৮ মার্চ হাইকোর্ট রায় দেন।

রায়ে কিছু সরকারি প্রতিষ্ঠানের উচ্চ পদে রিট আবেদনকারীদের (ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর) জন্য কিছু পদ রাখতে বা সন্নিবেশিত করতে নির্দেশ দেওয়া হয়, যদি পদ না থাকে তাহলে যোগ্যতাসাপেক্ষে যেকোনোভাবে জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে পদোন্নতি দিতে বলা হয়।

রায়ের পর থেকেই পলিটেকনিকের শিক্ষার্থীরা ধারাবাহিকভাবে আন্দোলন করছেন। ছয় দফা দাবির মধ্যে প্রথমটি হলো জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে ক্রাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের ৩০ শতাংশ প্রমোশন কোটা বাতিল করতে হবে। জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে ক্রাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের অবৈধ পদোন্নতির রায় হাইকোর্ট কর্তৃক বাতিল করতে হবে। ক্রাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের পদবি পরিবর্তন, মামলার সঙ্গে সংশ্লিষ্ট ব্যক্তিদের চাকরিচ্যুত করতে হবে। ২০২১ সালে রাতের আঁধারে নিয়োগপ্রাপ্ত ক্রাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের নিয়োগ সম্পূর্ণভাবে বাতিল এবং সেই বিতর্কিত নিয়োগবিধি অবিলম্বে সংশোধন করতে হবে।

দ্বিতীয় দাবি, ডিপ্লোমা ইন ইঞ্জিনিয়ারিং কোর্সে যেকোনো বয়সে ভর্তির সুযোগ বাতিল করতে হবে। উন্নত বিশ্বের আদলে চার বছর মেয়াদি মানসম্পন্ন কারিকুলাম চালু করতে হবে এবং একাডেমিক কার্যক্রম পর্যায়ক্রমে ইংরেজি মাধ্যমে করতে হবে।

তৃতীয় দাবি, উপসহকারী প্রকৌশলী ও সমমান (দশম গ্রেড) থেকে পাস করা শিক্ষার্থীদের জন্য সংরক্ষিত থাকা সত্ত্বেও যেসব সরকারি, রাষ্ট্রীয়, স্বায়ত্তশাসিত ও স্বশাসিত প্রতিষ্ঠানে ডিপ্লোমা প্রকৌশলীদের নিম্ন পদে নিয়োগ দেওয়া হচ্ছে, তাদের বিরুদ্ধে আইনি ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ করতে হবে।

চতুর্থ দাবি, কারিগরি সেক্টর পরিচালনায় পরিচালক, সহকারী পরিচালক, বোর্ড চেয়ারম্যান, উপসচিব, পরীক্ষা নিয়ন্ত্রক, অধ্যক্ষসহ সংশ্লিষ্ট সব পদে কারিগরি শিক্ষাবহির্ভূত জনবল নিয়োগ নিষিদ্ধ করতে হবে এবং তা আইনানুগভাবে নিশ্চিত করতে হবে। এই পদগুলোয় অনতিবিলম্বে কারিগরি শিক্ষায় শিক্ষিত জনবল নিয়োগ ও সব শূন্য পদে দক্ষ শিক্ষক ও ল্যাব সহকারী নিয়োগের বিজ্ঞপ্তি প্রকাশ করতে হবে।

পঞ্চম দাবি, স্বতন্ত্র ‘কারিগরি ও উচ্চশিক্ষা’ মন্ত্রণালয় প্রতিষ্ঠা ও ‘কারিগরি শিক্ষা সংস্কার কমিশন’ গঠন করতে হবে।

আর ষষ্ঠ দাবি হলো পলিটেকনিক ও মনোটেকনিক ইনস্টিটিউট থেকে পাস করা শিক্ষার্থীদের উচ্চশিক্ষার সুযোগের লক্ষ্যে একটি উন্নত মানের টেকনিক্যাল বিশ্ববিদ্যালয় প্রতিষ্ঠা করতে হবে। পাশাপাশি নির্মাণাধীন চারটি ইঞ্জিনিয়ারিং কলেজে (নড়াইল, নাটোর, খাগড়াছড়ি ও ঠাকুরগাঁও) পলিটেকনিক ও মনোটেকনিক থেকে পাস করা শিক্ষার্থীদের জন্য অস্থায়ী ক্যাম্পাস এবং ডুয়েটের আওতাভুক্ত একাডেমিক কার্যক্রম পরিচালনার মাধ্যমে আগামী সেশন থেকে শতভাগ আসনে ভর্তির সুযোগ নিশ্চিত করতে হবে।

দাবিগুলো পূরণ না হলে কঠোর কর্মসূচিতে যাওয়ার ঘোষণা দিয়েছেন আন্দোলনকারীরা।

হাইকোর্টের রায়ের বিরুদ্ধে কারিগরি শিক্ষা অধিদপ্তরের মহাপরিচালক ১৫ এপ্রিল লিভ টু আপিল (আপিলের অনুমতি চেয়ে আবেদন) করেন। শুনানি নিয়ে আপিল বিভাগের চেম্বার বিচারপতি মো. রেজাউল হক রোববার হাইকোর্টের আদেশ স্থগিত করেন। একই সঙ্গে আবেদনটি আগামী ১৮ মে আপিল বিভাগের নিয়মিত বেঞ্চে শুনানি করতে বলা হয়েছে।

এদিকে শিক্ষা মন্ত্রণালয়ের কারিগরি ও মাদ্রাসা শিক্ষা বিভাগ বলছে, আন্দোলনকারীদের সব দাবি মানা কঠিন। 

ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর কারা

ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর হলেন এমন প্রশিক্ষক, যাঁরা কারিগরি বা বৃত্তিমূলক শিক্ষার বিভিন্ন ট্রেডে হাতে-কলমে প্রশিক্ষণ দেন। তাঁরা মূলত ডিপ্লোমা ইঞ্জিনিয়ারিং বা ভোকেশনাল কোর্সের শিক্ষার্থীদের ব্যবহারিক বা প্র্যাকটিক্যাল ক্লাস পরিচালনা করেন।

কারিগরি শিক্ষাব্যবস্থায় শুরু থেকে সরাসরি শিক্ষা কার্যক্রমের সঙ্গে যুক্ত ব্যক্তিদের মধ্যে জনবলকাঠামো অনুযায়ী চিফ ইনস্ট্রাক্টর, ইনস্ট্রাক্টর, জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর ও ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর রয়েছেন। এর মধ্যে ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদটি সরকারি বেতনকাঠামোর ১৩তম গ্রেডের।

অবশ্য ১৭তম গ্রেডে বেতনপ্রাপ্ত ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরও রয়েছেন। তাঁদের মূল কাজ পরীক্ষাগার-ওয়ার্কশপে দায়িত্ব পালন করা এবং ওয়ার্কশপ ও পরীক্ষাগারের যন্ত্রপাতি সংরক্ষণ করে রাখা ও রক্ষণাবেক্ষণ করা। তাঁরা যন্ত্রপাতি কীভাবে চালানো যায়, সে বিষয়ে শিক্ষার্থীদের প্রশিক্ষণ দেন।

আন্দোলনকারীরা যা বলছেন

শিক্ষার্থীরা বলছেন, অনেকেই আছেন, যাঁরা অফিস সহায়ক পদ থেকে পদোন্নতি পেয়ে ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর হয়েছেন। অনেকে অনিয়মিত কর্মী (মাস্টাররোল) হিসেবে নিয়োগ পেয়ে পদোন্নতির মাধ্যমে ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর হয়েছেন। এ ধরনের কর্মচারীরা জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে পদোন্নতি পেলে কারিগরি শিক্ষার মর্যাদা কমবে।

ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদের নাম পরিবর্তনের বিষয়ে শিক্ষার্থীরা বলছেন, চিফ ইনস্ট্রাক্টর ও ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর—দুটি পদেরই সংক্ষিপ্ত রূপ সিআই। এ কারণে ক্র্যাফট ইন্সপেক্টরদের অনেকে বিভিন্ন জায়গায় সিআই পরিচয় দিয়ে অনৈতিক সুবিধা নেওয়ার চেষ্টা করেন।

২০২১ সালে নিয়োগ পাওয়া স্নাতক ডিগ্রিধারী ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের নিয়োগ বাতিলের দাবির বিষয়ে আন্দোলনকারীরা বলছেন, এই নিয়োগের ফলে কারিগরি শিক্ষাপ্রতিষ্ঠান থেকে পাস করে বের হওয়া শিক্ষার্থীদের কর্মসংস্থানের অনিশ্চয়তা তৈরি হচ্ছে। তাঁরা বলছেন, যেখানে উচ্চশিক্ষিত জনবলের প্রয়োজন নেই, সেখানে তাঁদের নিয়োগ দেওয়া অযৌক্তিক।

বিতর্কিতভাবে নিয়োগপ্রাপ্ত (২০২১ সালে) ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের কোনো কারিগরি যোগ্যতার ভিত্তিতে নিয়োগ দেওয়া হয়নি বলেও দাবি করছেন আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীরা। তাঁরা বলছেন, তাঁদের নিয়োগে যোগ্যতা হিসেবে পদার্থবিজ্ঞান ও রসায়নে স্নাতক হিসেবে উল্লেখ করা হয়েছিল। গোপনে নিয়োগবিধি পরিবর্তন করে তাঁদের নিয়োগ দেওয়া হয়।

কারিগরি ছাত্র আন্দোলনের প্রধান কার্যনির্বাহী সদস্য জুবায়ের পাটোয়ারী শুক্রবার প্রথম আলোকে বলেন, যাঁরা পদোন্নতির জন্য রিট করেছেন, তাঁদের মধ্যে একজন এসএসসি পাস ব্যক্তি রয়েছেন। তিনি পদোন্নতি পেয়ে যখন শিক্ষকতায় আসবেন, তিনি কী শেখাবেন!

ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে উচ্চশিক্ষিত জনবল নিয়োগের বিষয়ে জুবায়ের বলেন, তাহলে বৃত্তিমূলক শিক্ষাদানকারী প্রতিষ্ঠান থেকে এসএসসি-এইচএসসি পাস করে যাঁরা বের হবেন, তাঁদের চাকরির নিশ্চয়তা সরকার কোথা থেকে দেবে।

‘বক্তব্য সঠিক নয়’

কারিগরি শিক্ষা অধিদপ্তরের অধীন পলিটেকনিক ইনস্টিটিউটগুলোতে কর্মরত ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের সংগঠন বাংলাদেশ পলিটেকনিক নন-গেজেটেড টিচার্স অ্যাসোসিয়েশন (বাপনটিএ)।

সংগঠনটির তথ্য বলছে, সারা দেশে ১৩তম গ্রেডে ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের সংখ্যা প্রায় ২ হাজার ২০০। এঁদের মধ্যে স্নাতক ডিগ্রিধারী প্রকৌশলী রয়েছেন ৪০০ জনের বেশি। ডিপ্লোমা ইঞ্জিনিয়ার রয়েছেন প্রায় ৫০০ জন। পদার্থ ও রসায়নে স্নাতক ডিগ্রিধারীর সংখ্যা প্রায় ১ হাজার। এসএসসি (ভোকেশনাল) পাস করা রয়েছেন প্রায় ৩০০ জন।

বাপনটিএর সদস্যদের অভিযোগ, নতুন যোগদান করা জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর ও বিগত সরকারের সময় প্রকল্প থেকে সরাসরি উচ্চপদে নিয়োগ পাওয়া কর্মকর্তারা শিক্ষার্থীদের উসকানি দিয়ে আন্দোলনে নামিয়েছেন। কারণ হলো ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টররা জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদে পদোন্নতি পেলে মর্যাদা ক্ষুণ্ন হবে বলে মনে করছেন তাঁরা (জুনিয়র ইনস্ট্রাক্টর)।

পিয়ন থেকে কারিগরি শিক্ষাপ্রতিষ্ঠানের শিক্ষক হওয়ার সুযোগ তৈরি হবে—আন্দোলনকারীদের এমন দাবি সঠিক নয় বলেও অভিযোগ করছেন ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টররা। তাঁরা বলছেন, ১৭তম গ্রেডে চাকরি করা ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টররা এই পদোন্নতির আওতাভুক্ত নন।

বাপনটিএর একজন নেতা নাম প্রকাশ না করার শর্তে প্রথম আলোকে বলেন, ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদটি শিক্ষক পদ। তাঁদের মানহানি করার জন্য ১৭তম গ্রেডের ল্যাবরেটরি বেয়ারার এবং দক্ষ বাহক পদের নাম পরিবর্তন করে ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর করা হয়েছে। এসব পদের কর্মপরিধি ১৩তম গ্রেডের ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের ওপর চাপিয়ে শিক্ষার্থীদের ভুল বোঝানো হয়েছে।

যা বলছে কারিগরি শিক্ষা বিভাগ

কারিগরি শিক্ষা বিভাগ সূত্রে জানা গেছে, আন্দোলনকারী শিক্ষার্থীদের বেশ কয়েকটি দাবিকে ইতিবাচক হিসেবে দেখা হচ্ছে। এর মধ্যে ২০২১ সালে সংশোধিত নিয়োগ বিধিমালা আবার সংশোধনের সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছে কারিগরি শিক্ষা বিভাগ।

২০২১ সালে নিয়োগপ্রাপ্ত ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টরদের নিয়োগ বাতিল করার যে দাবি, তা পূরণ কারিগরি শিক্ষা বিভাগের এখতিয়ারভুক্ত নয় বলে জানিয়েছেন কর্মকর্তারা। সূত্র জানিয়েছে, ক্র্যাফট ইনস্ট্রাক্টর পদ থেকে পদোন্নতির বিষয়ে ভিন্ন ব্যবস্থা রাখার কথা ভাবা হচ্ছে।

জানতে চাইলে কারিগরি ও মাদ্রাসা শিক্ষা বিভাগের সচিব খ ম কবিরুল ইসলাম প্রথম আলোকে বলেন, ‘যে দাবিগুলো নিয়ে তাঁরা কথা বলছেন, এগুলো আমার কাছে খুব ছোট দাবি। আমি ওদের নিয়ে আরও বড় চিন্তা করছি, পরিকল্পনা করছি এবং কাজ শুরুও করেছি।’ তিনি বলেন, ‘কারিগরি শিক্ষাকে আমি বাংলাদেশের মেইন স্ট্রিম (মূল ধারা) করতে চাই। তারা আমাদের সঙ্গে আলাপ–আলোচনা করুক। সমঝোতার মাধ্যমে যেগুলো সম্ভব আমরা মেনে নেব।’

Source: https://www.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/ouefmsy9fz

76

Law of Bangladesh / Police investigation of crime

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 22, 2025, 11:42:12 AM »

Police investigation of crime

Once a cognisable case is registered, the police initiate the criminal justice process by launching an investigation to uncover the truth. Crime investigation is a core function of law enforcement in Bangladesh, playing a crucial role in maintaining law and order and ensuring justice. This process involves gathering evidence, identifying suspects, and holding perpetrators accountable through legal means. Many other police duties, such as patrolling, intelligence gathering, and community policing, directly or indirectly support investigations by providing vital information. Similarly, maintaining public records, addressing complaints, and managing crime prevention programmes contribute to the broader goal of solving crimes. A thorough and objective investigation brings offenders to justice and deters future crimes, fostering a safer society.

The investigation of crimes by the police in Bangladesh is primarily governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, along with other legal provisions, such as the Penal Code 1860; Police Regulations 1943; the Evidence Act 1872; the Police Act 1861 and other laws. The Code of Criminal Procedure outlines the procedure for criminal investigations, detailing how the police must collect evidence, question witnesses, and interrogate suspects. Additionally, the police must ensure that investigations comply with the principles of natural justice and due process, particularly in relation to the rights of the accused.

A criminal investigation typically involves visiting the crime scene, collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses, and interrogating suspects. In complex cases, forensic techniques such as DNA analysis, fingerprinting, and ballistics play a crucial role, though access to such facilities remains limited in many parts of Bangladesh. Investigating officers may also seek court-issued warrants for searches, seizures, or arrests, though, in certain situations, they are authorised to proceed without them. As technology advances, the public increasingly expects law enforcement to leverage modern scientific tools to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of investigations. From forensic science and data analytics to surveillance technologies and digital evidence processing, these resources have immense potential to unravel complex cases swiftly and effectively. By integrating such tools into their operations, the police can ensure that investigations are not only thorough but also impartial and resistant to errors. However, these facilities are not widely accessible across Bangladesh.

In cases involving major crimes such as murder, terrorism, or corruption, specialised units like the Detective Branch, Counter-Terrorism and Transnational Crime Unit, or the Criminal Investigation Department and Police Bureau of Investigation often take over. These units are better equipped and staffed with skilled personnel trained in advanced investigative techniques.

The primary objective of a police investigation is to uncover the truth, identify and apprehend offenders, and ensure they are held accountable under the law while protecting innocent individuals from wrongful implication based on weak or unreliable evidence. This dual responsibility reflects the delicate balance between ensuring public safety and safeguarding individual rights, which lies at the heart of any just legal system. A thorough, fact-based investigation seeks to secure justice for victims and uphold their rights while supporting the judicial process with strong, admissible evidence. Additionally, crime investigations play a crucial role in preventing future offences by identifying patterns, recommending policy changes, and strengthening law enforcement strategies. By maintaining transparency, fairness, and efficiency, police investigations enhance public trust in the legal system and contribute to a safer, more just society.

Lawyers highlight that the overall conviction rate in criminal cases in the country is around 20 per cent, meaning 80 per cent of accused individuals are ultimately acquitted, raising serious concerns about the effectiveness of the criminal justice system and the need for reform. Defective and perfunctory investigations are often attributed to producing weak evidence that cannot withstand legal scrutiny, with cases frequently failing due to missing or improperly collected forensic evidence, incomplete documentation, or procedural errors exploited by defence lawyers. Additionally, the failure to produce witnesses or their absence in court further weakens trials, as witness testimonies are crucial in establishing guilt, yet delays, fear of retaliation, and logistical challenges often render them unavailable when needed.

While inadequate investigations are often cited as the primary cause of low conviction rates, they are only one part of a broader system. Even a well-conducted investigation with strong evidence may fail if prosecutors, forensic experts, prison authorities, and the judiciary do not fulfil their roles effectively. Convictions depend on a multi-stage process involving investigation, prosecution, judicial proceedings, and witness testimony, and failures at any stage can significantly reduce the chances of securing a conviction. While prosecution is crucial in transforming investigative findings into persuasive legal arguments, its success depends on the skill, experience, and motivation of prosecutors. Similarly, forensic experts provide critical scientific analysis, but their contributions are often undermined by underfunded, outdated, or unreliable forensic facilities. Additionally, bureaucratic inefficiencies, backlogged courts, and procedural delays weaken cases, giving defendants opportunities to exploit technicalities or benefit from witnesses’ fading memories. Prison and correctional institutions also play a role by ensuring that offenders do not manipulate the system to evade justice while awaiting trial.

The criminal justice system functions as an interconnected mechanism in which each component must operate efficiently for justice to be served. Securing a conviction is not solely the responsibility of investigating officers or prosecutors but requires cooperation and competence across all sectors. Failures in legal representation, judicial inefficiencies, or forensic shortcomings increase the likelihood of acquittals, weakening the justice system. Addressing the low conviction rate requires a holistic reform approach that strengthens investigations, enhances prosecutorial effectiveness, improves forensic capabilities, ensures judicial accountability, and streamlines legal proceedings. Without comprehensive improvements, inefficiencies will persist, ultimately eroding public trust in law enforcement and the rule of law.

In addition to the low conviction rate, the police investigation of crimes in Bangladesh is often criticised by the public, lawyers, and civil society due to allegations of political influence, corruption, inefficiency, and human rights violations. Many believe that investigations are biased, with cases sometimes fabricated against political opponents or manipulated to protect influential individuals. Corruption, including bribery and misuse of power, weakens public trust, while delays in investigations and judicial proceedings prolong justice. Forced confessions and custodial torture are major concerns, as is the lack of forensic expertise and reliance on weak evidence. Inadequate witness protection discourages testimony, and poor coordination between police and the judiciary leads to case dismissals due to lack of evidence. Additionally, mishandling of gender-based crimes, failure to address organised and financial crimes effectively, and a general lack of transparency further erode confidence in law enforcement. To improve investigations, Bangladesh needs institutional reforms, better training, independent oversight, and the adoption of modern forensic and investigative techniques.

Resource availability plays a significant role in determining the effectiveness of criminal investigations. The collection and analysis of forensic evidence are labour-intensive and costly, which is why scientific investigative techniques are typically reserved for the most serious crimes, such as homicide, sexual assault, and high-value property crimes.

It is important to provide investigators with adequate financial and logistical resources to improve case clearance rates. However, officers-in-charge of police stations in Bangladesh reveal a stark reality: virtually no operational budget is allocated to support criminal investigations. The government has recently introduced an investigation fund, providing Tk 2000–5000 per case. However, this amount is grossly inadequate given the actual costs of thorough investigative work. A standard case costs around Tk 5,000-7,000 to investigate, while complex cases such as robbery or rape can cost between Tk 20,000 and 30,000. Therefore, investigators frequently report that a lack of financial support forces them to rely on personal funds or external sources to conduct investigations, travel to crime scenes, or gather evidence. To ensure effective and thorough investigations, government funding should align with the actual costs involved.

Limited access to modern forensic equipment, a lack of trained forensic personnel, and inadequate transport facilities further impede investigations, making it difficult for law enforcement agencies to collect, preserve, and analyze crucial evidence. Many police stations, particularly those in rural areas, lack even the most basic forensic tools, forcing investigators to rely on outdated methods that often fail to meet the standards required for securing convictions. Without proper forensic capabilities, officers are left to depend on eyewitness testimonies and circumstantial evidence, both of which can be unreliable and easily challenged in court.

The absence of essential tools such as fingerprint kits, forensic testing equipment, and digital crime analysis software significantly reduces the efficiency and accuracy of police investigations. Proper fingerprint identification can link suspects to crime scenes, yet many stations lack the necessary kits or trained personnel to conduct such examinations effectively. Similarly, forensic testing — such as DNA analysis, toxicology reports, and ballistic examinations — remains out of reach for most cases due to limited facilities and a backlog of pending forensic requests at underfunded government labs. Digital crime analysis software, which can help track criminal patterns, analyse surveillance footage, and detect cybercrimes, is often unavailable or underutilised due to a lack of technical expertise among officers.

In addition to these challenges, inadequate transport facilities hinder timely evidence collection and suspect apprehension. Crime scenes often require immediate forensic examination, but delays caused by a shortage of police vehicles or poorly maintained transport infrastructure result in the loss or contamination of critical evidence. In many cases, forensic teams must travel long distances to reach crime scenes, sometimes arriving too late to gather fresh, uncontaminated samples. These logistical shortcomings not only slow down investigations but also weaken the overall criminal justice process, leading to lower conviction rates and increased public distrust in law enforcement capabilities. Strengthening forensic resources, investing in officer training, and modernising investigative tools are essential steps toward improving the effectiveness of police investigations.

The state exerts substantial control over police agencies in Bangladesh, often using them as political tools rather than for public safety. Consequently, many policing policies are politically driven, with frequent interference by political leaders in criminal investigations, influencing charge sheets and final reports to align with ruling party interests, especially in high-profile cases. Politicians, influential elites, and law enforcement superiors pressure investigators to frame or exonerate individuals, obstructing impartial investigations and lowering crime clearance rates. A police officer assigned to an investigation has the exclusive authority and unfettered right to conduct the investigation. Therefore, from a technical and legal standpoint, no senior officer, including the Inspector General of Police, can dictate the course of the investigation. However, senior officers may supervise the case to provide guidance and support in the investigative process. However, political and external pressures frequently undermine this independence, leading to undue influence that compromises investigative integrity. Cases are often manipulated to shield allies or target opponents with fabricated charges, eroding public trust in the justice system and raising serious concerns about impartiality.

Beyond political interference, other external actors, including prosecutors, forensic experts, and the judiciary, also play roles in shaping case outcomes. Effective case clearance depends on seamless coordination between police investigators, forensic teams, prosecutors, and judicial authorities. However, bureaucratic inefficiencies, lack of inter-agency collaboration, and internal power struggles within law enforcement agencies often hinder effective case resolution.

Given this reality, the recent proposal by the Judicial Reform Commission to establish a new investigative agency is realistic in alignment with public expectations. But it has sparked an important question: What guarantees are there that this new body will remain free from external influence? Without robust institutional safeguards, there is a risk that the same patterns of political meddling and corruption could persist, merely shifting from one agency to another. To ensure true independence, the new agency would require clear legal protections, strict oversight mechanisms, and a transparent accountability framework to prevent interference from political or other powerful interests. Otherwise, the creation of a new body might simply replicate existing problems rather than resolve them.

Experts argue that Bangladesh police already have specialised investigative agencies, such as the Criminal Investigation Department and the Police Bureau of Investigation, which are capable of handling complex cases. Rather than creating new entities, these agencies can be further strengthened by equipping them with advanced training, modern forensic tools, and sufficient logistical and financial resources to ensure fair, efficient, and impartial investigations. Ultimately, comprehensive institutional reforms, coupled with enhanced training and accountability mechanisms, are necessary to build public trust and ensure a fair and effective justice system.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/262798/police-investigation-of-crime#:~:text=Crime%20investigation%20is%20a%20core,perpetrators%20accountable%20through%20legal%20means.

77

Law of Bangladesh / Arrest and remand

« Last post by Imrul Hasan Tusher on April 22, 2025, 11:39:20 AM »

Arrest and remand

IN BANGLADESH, the process of arrest is primarily governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) of 1898, which establishes the legal framework for detaining individuals suspected of criminal activity. Under Section 54 of the CrPC, police officers have the authority to arrest individuals without a warrant in specific situations, such as involvement in serious crimes like murder, theft, or terrorism, known as a cognisable offence. For non-cognisable offences, prior judicial approval is required.  Other local and special laws also empower police officers to arrest without a warrant. Law enforcement officers wield significant discretion in arresting individuals suspected of cognisable offences or those deemed threats to public safety. The law requires that the arresting officer physically restrain the individual unless they voluntarily submit to custody through words or actions. When an arrest is made without a warrant, the detainee must be presented before a magistrate within 24 hours, excluding travel time. Any detention beyond this period requires judicial authorisation, ensuring oversight and preventing unlawful confinement.

Concerns persist over the misuse of arrest powers, particularly under Section 54, which has been criticised for enabling detentions without sufficient evidence and raising allegations of human rights violations. Critics argue that the broad discretionary authority granted under this provision can lead to arbitrary arrests and detentions. Frequent complaints highlight the arbitrary application of Section 54 and other special or local laws, often under preventive provisions of the CrPC, underscoring the need for professionalism and strict adherence to legal limits in policing. Since arrests inherently restrict an individual’s liberty and fundamental rights, they must be legally justified, serving either investigative needs or legitimate public security interests.

To uphold both the letter and spirit of the law, the arrest process and subsequent actions must strictly follow legal protocols. Ensuring transparency and ethical policing is essential, particularly in sensitive areas such as arrests, interrogations, and the humane treatment of suspects. Publishing crime statistics and audit reports is a crucial step toward rebuilding public confidence in law enforcement. Additionally, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh issued the landmark ‘15 Guidelines on Arrest and Remand’ in the BLAST vs Bangladesh case to prevent arbitrary arrests and abuse of power. These guidelines emphasise the importance of due process, transparency, and respect for human rights during arrests and detentions.

The practice of plainclothes police and other law enforcement officials conducting searches and arrests in Bangladesh without revealing their identity raises serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and due process. Such actions often foster doubt and suspicion among citizens, eroding public trust in law enforcement. The absence of proper identification makes it difficult to determine whether those making arrests are legitimate authorities, impostors, or criminal groups, creating opportunities for misuse of power, wrongful detentions, or criminal activities with ulterior motives.

In Bangladesh, multiple law enforcement agencies are involved in arrests and detentions, often leading to confusion and distress for the relatives of detainees, who struggle to locate their custody status. To uphold the rule of law and protect citizens’ rights, it is essential for law enforcement officers to follow established protocols, including proper identification and disclosure of their authority during such operations.

In Bangladesh, the lack of clarity regarding the cause of arrest and the failure to inform relatives of the detained persons about their exact location pose serious concerns for human rights and the rule of law. This opacity often results in heightened frustration, emotional distress, and mistrust among families and communities, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and accountability. Such practices may also enable potential abuse of authority and violations of procedural safeguards designed to protect individuals from arbitrary detention. To address these issues, it is imperative for law enforcement and other agencies to ensure that reasons for arrests are communicated transparently and promptly and that the whereabouts of detainees are disclosed to their families in accordance with legal and ethical standards.

Police remand

Police remand for interrogation is a contentious yet integral part of the criminal justice system in Bangladesh. This process allows law enforcement to temporarily detain a suspect in their custody to extract information, conduct further investigations, or gather evidence related to an ongoing case. While police remand serves as a valuable tool for solving complex crimes, it is often criticised for potential misuse, violations of human rights, and the lack of proper oversight.

In Bangladesh, the power of the police to seek remand is primarily governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Under Section 167 of the CrPC, when an individual is arrested and cannot be released on bail, the police may request the magistrate to place the suspect under police remand for interrogation. However, such requests must be supported by reasonable grounds indicating the necessity of further custodial interrogation.

The duration of remand is determined by the magistrate and cannot exceed 15 days in total. Moreover, courts are expected to exercise discretion in granting remand, ensuring that the police provide adequate justification for their request. Legal safeguards are in place to protect the rights of detainees, such as the requirement to present them before a magistrate and the right to legal representation during remand hearings.

Despite the legal provisions, the practical application of police remand in Bangladesh raises several concerns. A significant issue is the alleged misuse of remand to coerce confessions through physical or psychological torture. Human rights organisations have reported numerous cases where suspects were subjected to inhumane treatment, including beatings, sleep deprivation, and threats, during their time in police custody. Such practices not only violate the Constitution of Bangladesh, which guarantees the right to life and freedom from torture, but also undermine the credibility of the justice system.

Police interrogations of suspects during police custody are a crucial part of criminal investigations, aimed at gathering information, clarifying facts, and determining a suspect’s involvement in a crime. Effective interrogation techniques include rapport-building, presenting evidence, and psychological strategies, all conducted within a controlled environment that upholds legal protections. However, coercion, threats, or mistreatment not only violate ethical and legal standards but also lead to unreliable confessions and wrongful convictions. The use of torture in police custody, despite being explicitly prohibited under international treaties like the UN Convention Against Torture, remains a serious human rights violation in some regions. Ensuring humane and lawful interrogation methods is essential to upholding justice and protecting individual rights.

Custodial deaths in Bangladesh remain a serious human rights concern, often linked to torture, excessive force, and abuse of power by law enforcement. These incidents expose systemic flaws within the criminal justice system, including a lack of accountability and transparency, which not only violate legal standards but also erode public trust in law enforcement. Widespread criticism from human rights organisations underscores the urgent need for reform to prevent further abuses, ensure detainee protection, and hold perpetrators accountable.

Similarly, the use of police remand under Section 167 of the CrPC must be justified by a genuine investigative necessity. Public trust demands that interrogations during remand remain free from physical torture, degrading treatment, or custodial violence, as such practices undermine the rule of law, erode confidence in law enforcement, and provoke public condemnation. Detention must never exceed the period authorised by the court, as any overreach threatens the principles of justice and accountability.

The use of police remand raises critical ethical concerns about balancing public safety with individual rights. While law enforcement agencies argue that custodial interrogation is necessary for solving crimes and preventing further offences, the risk of abuse and wrongful detention remains significant. The reliance on confessions obtained during remand undermines the principles of fair investigation, as coerced statements are often unreliable and may lead to the conviction of innocent individuals. Moreover, the disproportionate targeting of marginalised groups in remand proceedings highlights deeper systemic biases within the justice system. Members of disadvantaged communities, including dissenting voices and opposition political figures, are particularly vulnerable to mistreatment, exacerbating existing inequalities and further eroding public trust in law enforcement.

To address the issues surrounding police remand in Bangladesh, reforms should focus on strengthening judicial oversight by ensuring magistrates rigorously assess remand requests with proper training, enforcing the Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention) Act, 2013, to prevent custodial torture, and implementing surveillance measures like video-recorded interrogations. Additionally, modern investigative techniques, such as forensic science and digital evidence gathering, should be promoted to reduce reliance on confessions. Providing accessible legal aid, particularly for marginalised detainees, is essential to safeguarding rights and preventing wrongful detention.

In Bangladesh, there are persistent allegations that law enforcement authorities detain suspects for indefinite periods without proper judicial authorisation, violating legal safeguards and fundamental rights. Such practices often involve the misuse of legal provisions, such as preventive detention laws or delays in producing suspects before a magistrate, despite the constitutional mandate requiring prompt judicial oversight. Reports suggest that detainees are sometimes held in undisclosed locations, subjected to coercive interrogations, or denied access to legal counsel and family members. This lack of accountability raises serious human rights concerns, as prolonged detention without court approval increases the risk of abuse, torture, and forced confessions. Human rights organisations and legal experts have repeatedly called for stricter enforcement of due process, emphasising the need for transparent policing and adherence to constitutional and international legal standards to prevent arbitrary detention.

Enforced disappearance remains a critical human rights concern in Bangladesh, with allegations that law enforcement agencies and security forces detain individuals in secret, denying their whereabouts to family members and legal representatives. Victims, often political opponents, activists, journalists, or dissenting voices, are reportedly taken without formal charges, sometimes reappearing in custody after extended periods or, in some cases, never returning. These disappearances violate fundamental rights, including protection from arbitrary detention and the right to a fair trial, fostering a climate of fear and impunity. Despite official denials, calls for legal reforms and independent oversight continue to grow, emphasising the urgent need to uphold the rule of law and protect citizens from state abuses.

In Bangladesh, ‘crossfire’ and ‘counter-killing’ are terms often associated with extrajudicial executions carried out by law enforcement agencies under the pretext of armed encounters. Authorities frequently justify such incidents by claiming that suspects were killed during shootouts while attempting to flee or attack officers. However, human rights organisations allege that many of these deaths are staged, with victims often being picked up beforehand and later found dead under questionable circumstances. Critics argue that these practices bypass due process, undermine the rule of law, and create a culture of impunity within law enforcement agencies. While some may defend such actions as necessary for maintaining law and order, the lack of independent investigations and judicial oversight raises serious concerns about human rights violations and the need for legal accountability to prevent misuse of power.

The processes of arrest and remand are essential components of the criminal justice system, yet they remain fraught with legal, ethical, and human rights concerns. While the legal framework, primarily governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898, provides the necessary authority for law enforcement to detain suspects, its implementation often raises critical questions about accountability, transparency, and the protection of fundamental rights.

Ultimately, law enforcement agencies must balance the need for effective crime control with the imperative to uphold the rule of law and human rights. Without meaningful reforms and strict adherence to legal procedures, the existing challenges surrounding arrest and remand will continue to erode public confidence in the justice system. Moving forward, a commitment to legal accountability, ethical policing, and respect for fundamental rights is essential for ensuring a fair and just system for all.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/262888/arrest-and-remand

78

Law of Bangladesh / A civilian as national security adviser

« Last post by Badshah Mamun on April 20, 2025, 11:39:00 AM »

A civilian as national security adviser

THE concept of national security has undergone a profound transformation in the 21st century. Once largely defined by military capabilities and external defence, national security now encompasses a vast spectrum of interconnected domains, including cyber resilience, economic integrity, public health and climate sustainability. In the light of these shifting dynamics, Khalilur Rahman’s appointment as Bangladesh’s national security adviser represents a significant evolution in the country’s strategic approach. While some may question the suitability of a civilian in a role traditionally associated with military leadership, this move reflects a necessary evolution in understanding the multifaceted nature of modern threats. It is imperative to explore how contemporary national security demands integrated civilian oversight, draws on global precedents and examines the implications of Khalilur Rahman’s appointment for Bangladesh’s internal and external security strategies.

National security refers to the protection of a nation’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and the well-being of its citizens from internal and external threats. In today’s interconnected world, the concept of national security has evolved beyond traditional military threats to encompass non-traditional security such as economic stability, cyber security, environmental sustainability, food security and public health. As states face increasingly complex and transnational challenges, the strategies for ensuring national security must also adapt to reflect these shifting realities.

National security has been predominantly concerned with military threats and defence strategies. Realist theorists, such as Hans Morgenthau, emphasised the role of power politics and the state in maintaining security through military strength. This perspective was dominant during the cold-war era when the threat of nuclear war and global ideological confrontation framed national security discourses. Defence budgets, intelligence gathering and military alliances such as NATO and the Warsaw Pact were central to national security strategies.

With the end of the cold war and the rise of globalisation, the nature of threats to national security began to change. Issues such as terrorism, cyber attacks, pandemics, climate change and economic instability became central concerns. The 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States marked a significant turning point, bringing the issue of non-state actors and asymmetric warfare to the forefront. This led to the development of doctrines like the US National security strategy which advocated for pre-emptive action and comprehensive counter-terrorism measures.

Cyber security has emerged as a significant pillar of national security in the digital age. Nation-states and non-state actors are increasingly using cyber tools to conduct espionage, disrupt critical infrastructure and influence democratic processes. The 2016 US election interference and various ransomware attacks targeting hospitals and financial institutions globally illustrate the growing cyber threat landscape.

In the case of Bangladesh, it is often regarded as a victim of the ‘tyranny of geography,’ given its strategic position between two powerful neighbours — India and China — which makes it inherently vulnerable to regional pressures and geopolitical rivalries. Surrounded on three sides by India and sharing a border with Myanmar while facing the Bay of Bengal to the south, Bangladesh must constantly navigate a delicate balance between powerful regional interests. This geographic reality, compounded by natural vulnerabilities like flooding and climate change, has often limited Bangladesh’s strategic autonomy. In this context, its national security resonates with a broader need for enhanced strategic deterrence — through advanced defence technology, cyber capabilities, satellite infrastructure and energy security — to assert national sovereignty. However, the most effective shield may lie in continued economic growth and diversification, building on the country’s impressive progress in the apparel industry, poverty reduction and human development. By investing in infrastructure, education and regional cooperation and maintaining balanced foreign relations, Bangladesh has the potential to transform its geographic constraints into strategic advantages, emerging not as a pawn but as a vital bridge in South Asia’s evolving geopolitical landscape.

As of 2025, Bangladesh is grappling with a complex array of national security challenges that threaten its political stability, economic resilience and social cohesion. The ousting of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, followed by a period marked by deep-seated grievances, simmering resentment and widespread discontent, has placed significant strain on governance. The interim administration, led by Muhammad Yunus, has committed extensive efforts to restoring law and order. In a major step towards normalisation, the government recently launched ‘Operation Devil Hunt,’ which has helped to re-establish stability in various aspects of public life.

At the same time, the administration has had to struggle with the disruptive impact of hundreds of protests and demonstrations, a reflection of the nation’s democratic fervour. Concurrently, the rapid pace of digitalisation has exposed serious cyber security vulnerabilities, including a significant data breach that has raised alarm across institutions.

On the regional front, the protracted Rohingya refugee crisis continues to escalate security concerns and impose a heavy burden on the national economy. Additionally, strained relations with India over a range of unresolved issues have further complicated Bangladesh’s diplomatic and economic landscape. Environmental threats, particularly in coastal regions, persistently displace communities and strain national resources, intensifying internal pressures and presenting long-term risks to national security.

In this broader context, the national security adviser holds a central position in shaping and harmonising policies aimed at safeguarding national strategic interests. Serving as the principal adviser to the head of government on matters of national security, this individual oversees a broad spectrum of issues ranging from defence, intelligence and cyber security to economic stability, political risk and international diplomacy. The position requires a deep understanding of both domestic and global dynamics and the adviser often acts as a bridge between civilian and military institutions, ensuring a coherent and integrated approach to national security policy and crisis management.

The appointment of Khalilur Rahman as the national security adviser has sparked considerable discussion, particularly on social media. Many critics question how a civilian could be entrusted with such a critical position when the country has a roster of experienced generals, admirals and air marshals. This criticism, however, often stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the distinction between national defence and national security. In our collective psyche, national security is still predominantly viewed through the narrow lens of military operations and the role of a national security adviser is almost instinctively associated with the armed forces.

As a result, the appointment of a civilian without a military background may seem unconventional or even difficult for some to fully comprehend. Even in routine institutional practice, when selecting personnel for senior advisory roles related to security, there is often a clear preference for military officers over even police officials despite the latter’s potentially broader experience in dealing with internal security, law enforcement and legal frameworks. Yet in today’s rapidly evolving global landscape, where security threats are multifaceted, ranging from cyber attacks and terrorism to disinformation, climate risks, and transnational crimes, the notion of national security has expanded well beyond traditional defence.

Against this backdrop, it may be time to revisit our assumptions about who is best suited to advise on national security. The role of a national security adviser is not merely to oversee military preparedness but to coordinate a wide array of policies that protect a nation’s strategic interests. In this broader and more nuanced context, the appointment of a civilian like Khalilur Rahman reflects a deliberate shift towards a more comprehensive and inclusive understanding of national security.

National defence is a vital but narrow subset of the broader construct of national security. Defence primarily addresses military threats and wartime contingencies. National security, on the other hand, is an ever-present, multidimensional framework encompassing a wide range of issues — food and health security, economic resilience, political stability, cultural harmony, religious and communal coexistence, human rights and the freedom of expression. It permeates every hour of our daily lives and informs of every aspect of governance.

In this broader context, appointing a civilian with expertise in economics, law, international relations and diplomacy is not only appropriate, it is essential. National security today requires integrated, cross-sectoral thinking. Most modern conflicts, on a closer inspection, are rooted not in military might but in economic disparities and geopolitical competition. A deep understanding of global systems and domestic vulnerabilities is key to formulating a sustainable and inclusive security strategy.

Khalilur Rahman’s academic and professional background spans economics, law, international affairs and public administration. His appointment reflects a deliberate and forward-thinking shift, one that prioritises intellectual breadth and inter-ministerial coordination over a singular focus on military credentials. This is in line with global best practices where national security advisers are often drawn from interdisciplinary backgrounds and are tasked with synthesising input from a range of ministries, including but not limited to defence.

That said, clarity in administrative communication remains essential. The official circular suggesting that Khalilur Rahman will also oversee defence matters could create confusion. In well-structured governance systems, the portfolios of national security and defence are distinct yet collaborative. While a national security adviser must regularly consult the ministry of defence on relevant matters, the role should not subsume the specialised responsibilities of defence professionals. Maintaining this separation ensures both civilian oversight and technical rigour.

A comparative analysis of the national security advisors of India and the United States may offer valuable insights. The national security advisers of both India and the United States have played pivotal roles in shaping strategic and security policies of their countries. In India, the first national security adviser, Brajesh Mishra, an Indian foreign service officer, laid the foundation of the role by combining it with the position of the principal secretary to the prime minister. He was succeeded by JN Dixit, MK Narayanan and Shivshankar Menon, each bringing diplomatic or intelligence backgrounds to the position. Ajit Doval, the current national security adviser since 2014, is a retired Indian Police Service officer and former director of the Intelligence Bureau, known for his hands-on approach to national security, counterterrorism and strategic policymaking. These advisers have been central to managing India’s defence posture, intelligence reforms and complex regional challenges, particularly concerning Pakistan, China and internal security.

The role of the United States national security adviser has been held by a diverse group of individuals with backgrounds ranging from academia and diplomacy to high-ranking military service. Henry Kissinger, a political scientist and diplomat, was instrumental in shaping détente with the USSR and initiating relations with China, later serving as the secretary of state. His successor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, another political scientist, focused on cold war strategy and human rights, notably supporting Afghan resistance against Soviet forces. Colin Powell, a decorated army general, brought a military perspective, becoming the first African American national security adviser. Condoleezza Rice, a Soviet expert, played a pivotal role during 9/11 and the Iraq war before becoming the secretary of state. Stephen Hadley and Thomas Donilon, both lawyers with policy backgrounds, helped steer US defence and Asia-Pacific strategies respectively. Military leaders like James L Jones, HR McMaster and Michael Flynn emphasised defence readiness and global military alliances, though Flynn’s brief tenure ended in controversy. Susan Rice, both diplomat and academic, has prioritised multilateral diplomacy, alliances, human rights and technology. John Bolton, known for his hawkish stance, and Robert C O’Brien, with a focus on NATO and Indo-Pacific engagement, reflect the evolving strategic priorities of the US in a changing global landscape. The current national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, under president Biden, is known for integrating diplomacy with domestic policy concerns, cyber security and reinforcing alliances. These advisors reflect the changing nature of global threats and the strategic priorities of their respective administrations.

In this context, any civilian officer’s appointment should be viewed not as a departure from tradition but as a necessary evolution in how we conceptualise national security in the 21st century. As threats grow increasingly complex and interconnected, the security of a nation lies not solely in its military strength, but in its ability to safeguard the economic, political and social well-being of its citizens. Appointing a civilian with the requisite breadth of knowledge is not a liability, it is a strategic asset. However, this does not preclude the possibility of appointing military officers as security advisers who possess a proven track record in dealing with national and international security concerns relevant to Bangladesh. Their background and expertise in strategic defence, intelligence and crisis management may offer valuable insights and capabilities in addressing emerging security challenges.

The appointment of Khalilur Rahman as Bangladesh’s national security adviser signals a significant and forward-looking shift in the nation’s approach to safeguarding its strategic interests. By emphasising interdisciplinary expertise over traditional military credentials, the government recognises that national security today is rooted in economic foresight, social stability, technological preparedness and diplomatic acumen. Rather than weakening the defence apparatus, this broader vision enhances it, acknowledging that contemporary threats cannot be neutralised through force alone. As global challenges become increasingly hybrid and unpredictable, civilian-led, inclusive and well-coordinated security frameworks will be essential for long-term resilience. This appointment should, therefore, be embraced not as a break from convention but as an informed alignment with global best practices in security governance.

Writer:
Dr Md Motiar Rahman is a retired deputy inspector general.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/262383/a-civilian-as-national-security-adviser

79

Law of Bangladesh / Vision for ideal police force

« Last post by Badshah Mamun on April 20, 2025, 11:37:21 AM »

Vision for ideal police force

THE police play a pivotal role in any society, entrusted with safeguarding public safety, maintaining order, and upholding justice. In Bangladesh, public expectations reflect a deep yearning for fairness, security, and trust, yet these hopes are often overshadowed by systemic challenges such as political influence, corruption, inefficiency, and human rights violations. The vision for an ideal police force in Bangladesh centres on creating a safer, democratic society grounded in justice and accountability. This requires a police service that exemplifies professionalism, integrity, inclusivity, and compassion, serving not merely as enforcers of the law but as true custodians of justice. Achieving this vision demands transformative reforms, including dismantling political interference, fostering accountability, and addressing systemic inefficiencies. It is imperative to explore the aspirations of the Bangladeshi people and the fundamental changes needed to establish a police force that inspires trust and upholds the principles of justice.

People expect the police to be vigilant protectors of their safety and security, serving as a shield against crime and disorder in both urban and rural areas. In cities, they combat theft, robbery, and organised crime, while in rural areas, they address land disputes, violence, and extremism. Emerging threats such as cybercrime, human trafficking, and terrorism require specialised skills, advanced tools, and a proactive approach. Strategies like patrolling, surveillance, intelligence-driven operations, public awareness campaigns, and collaborations with social organisations help tackle crime at its roots while reinforcing public trust. However, resource constraints and inadequate training often limit their effectiveness, particularly in Bangladesh. Investing in specialised training in cybersecurity, digital forensics, advanced technologies, ethical conduct, and de-escalation techniques is crucial for building a professional, adaptive police force. By upholding justice, fairness, and integrity, law enforcement can create an environment where people feel safe — whether carrying hard-earned wages home or walking freely in city streets and rural meadows of Bangladesh. A dedicated police force that prioritises crime prevention and human dignity strengthens the foundation of a peaceful and secure society.

Effective crime management requires a strategic balance of proactive and reactive policing, combining law enforcement, crime prevention, and victim support. Patrolling, surveillance, intelligence gathering, and swift emergency response play a key role in maintaining law and order. By analysing crime patterns, police can allocate resources efficiently to high-risk areas while addressing underlying causes of criminal behaviour. Community engagement fosters trust and encourages information-sharing, which enhances crime prevention efforts. Advances in technology, such as digital forensics, surveillance systems, and data analytics, have further strengthened crime detection and investigation. Intelligence-led policing, a proactive, data-driven approach, improves operational efficiency by identifying and disrupting criminal activities before they occur, particularly in cases of organised crime and terrorism. However, its success depends on robust information-sharing, inter-agency collaboration, and ethical data management to balance security with civil liberties. Beyond enforcement, comprehensive crime management involves addressing societal issues, supporting victims, and rehabilitating offenders. By integrating intelligence-driven strategies with professionalism, fairness, and empathy, the police contribute to safer and more resilient communities.

The people expect the police to play a fundamental role in upholding the rule of law, serving as the primary agency responsible for maintaining public order, protecting life and property, and ensuring the enforcement of laws. By investigating crimes, apprehending offenders, and preventing unlawful activities, the police act as a critical link between the legal framework and society. Their actions are governed by legal principles and ethical standards, ensuring that their power is exercised fairly, without bias or abuse. A well-functioning police force strengthens public trust in the justice system, promotes stability, and fosters a sense of security, all of which are essential for a society governed by the rule of law. Equally important is their accountability to the law, which ensures that their authority is not misused and that citizens’ rights are respected.

The inefficiency of the police in addressing crime undermines public safety and erodes trust in law enforcement institutions. This inefficiency can stem from various factors, such as inadequate training, insufficient resources, corruption, political intervention, and a lack of coordination within the criminal justice system. Delayed responses to emergencies, failure to conduct thorough investigations, and low conviction rates often leave victims without justice and embolden criminals. Bureaucratic hurdles and mismanagement can further exacerbate the problem, leading to a perception of ineffectiveness. Addressing these inefficiencies requires reforms that include better training, increased funding, implementation of modern technologies, and robust accountability measures to ensure police forces are equipped and motivated to fulfil their duties effectively.

Moreover, citizens expect that the prevention and investigation of crimes and police functions should closely align with the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of Bangladesh, particularly the protection of life, property, and individual freedoms. This alignment positions the police not merely as enforcers of the law but as guardians and protectors of citizens’ constitutional rights. Such a paradigm shift would go beyond fulfilling the basic mandate of maintaining law and order. It would foster a deeper sense of trust and confidence among the public, improve the police’s overall image, and encourage a stronger culture of respect for the rule of law within the police force itself. By adopting this approach, the police could redefine their role as a foundation of justice and equity, further strengthening the relationship between law enforcement and the society it serves.

When an offence is committed, it falls within the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. The formal initiation of legal proceedings against an alleged offender begins with registering a criminal case, typically through a First Information Report lodged by the victim, a witness, or any concerned party at the local police station. As mandated by Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (CrPC), the police are required to record any information regarding a cognisable offence, which includes serious crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, and terrorism — offences where the police have the authority to investigate and make arrests without prior court approval. Once an FIR is registered, the officer-in-charge of the police station assigns the case to an investigating officer, usually a sub-inspector, who is responsible for conducting the investigation in accordance with legal procedures. The IO gathers evidence, records witness statements, and examines the crime scene while ensuring compliance with the provisions of the CrPC, 1898, and Penal Code, 1860. Depending on the complexity of the case, the investigation may also involve forensic analysis, surveillance, and coordination with other law enforcement agencies. Ultimately, the IO compiles the findings into a police report, which is then submitted to the relevant court for further legal proceedings.

For non-cognisable offences, which include minor crimes like public nuisance, the police require prior approval from a magistrate before initiating an investigation. The distinction between cognisable and non-cognisable offences is crucial, as it determines the procedural course of action.

One of the most significant issues in Bangladesh’s criminal justice system is the police’s discretionary power in registering cases. Despite legal provisions mandating the filing of FIRs for cognisable offences, officers often refuse to do so due to external influences, corruption, or resource constraints. Victims, especially from disadvantaged communities, frequently face difficulties in lodging complaints, as police officers at stations often demand inducements — either monetary or through influential connections — to register an FIR, initiate investigations, or even record a General Diary entry. As a result, those without financial means or social influence struggle to access police services, even in serious cases.

The public expects the police to uphold fairness, transparency, and impartiality, particularly in case registration, by ensuring that every reported offence — whether cognisable or non-cognisable — is recorded under the appropriate legal provision. This responsibility is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the justice system and preserving public trust in law enforcement. Any failure to register cases properly can compromise legal provisions and weaken confidence in the rule of law. Emphasising this obligation, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, through various judicial pronouncements, has reinforced the mandatory nature of FIR registration when a cognisable offence is reported. The landmark case Suo Moto Rule No. 07 of 2020 underscored that law enforcement agencies must record complaints without unnecessary delay or discretion, ensuring that justice is not hindered at the very first stage of the legal process.

Despite the legal obligation for police to record complaints upon receiving information, allegations persist that investigating officers often delay the process by conducting preliminary enquiries and site visits before officially registering a crime. This delay is particularly prevalent in major cases such as murder and dacoity. Such initial postponements create opportunities for distortion of facts, compromising the timely collection of evidence and the immediate apprehension of suspects. With extended time at their disposal, complainants — sometimes with or without police collusion — may falsely implicate innocent individuals or omit the actual perpetrators. This manipulation enables law enforcement officers to fabricate case narratives and exploit innocent individuals by threatening prosecution unless they comply with their demands.

Integrity in case registration is critical, requiring meticulous attention to accuracy and fairness. The police must exercise extreme care to avoid implicating innocent individuals, as wrongful accusations shall have devastating consequences for those involved. In many cases, the First Information Report includes specific names, while others are listed as ‘unknown.’ While this practice can be necessary in some instances, it also opens the door to potential misuse. Such flexibility may allow officers to manipulate investigations, for example, by arbitrarily adding or excluding names as suspects or exercising undue discretion to make mass arrests. These actions can lead to the perception or reality of bias, favouritism, or abuse of power.

The people expect the police to handle all cases impartially, regardless of the status or influence of the individuals involved. They must not refuse to register an offense due to the involvement of powerful or politically connected persons, nor should they suppress cases to artificially lower crime statistics, as this would compromise the integrity of law enforcement. Ensuring that justice is applied equally to all citizens, irrespective of social, political, or economic standing, is fundamental to maintaining public trust. However, political interference remains a persistent challenge in Bangladesh, with powerful individuals and groups often pressuring the police to suppress complaints against their allies or fabricate cases against opponents. This not only undermines the impartiality of the justice system but also weakens confidence in law enforcement agencies.

While the refusal to register FIRs is a significant concern, the misuse of the criminal justice system through false or fabricated cases is another critical issue. The police must exercise due caution to ensure that registered cases are genuine and not based on false allegations, as fictitious cases — often referred to in Bangladesh as gaybi mamla (invisible or baseless cases) — are frequently used to harass political opponents, marginalised communities, rival groups, or dissenting individuals, fostering fear and mistrust. Such cases clog the justice system, divert resources from genuine complaints, and erode public confidence in law enforcement, making it harder for real victims to seek justice. Many individuals misuse legal processes to settle personal disputes, harass opponents, or seek revenge, further straining the judiciary. To counter this, the police must uphold ethical standards, remain vigilant in distinguishing between legitimate grievances and malicious cases, and ensure fairness and impartiality in their operations. Additionally, complainants who lodge false cases with malicious intent should be prosecuted under Section 211 of the Penal Code. Accurate and honest case registration is the foundation of a fair justice system, and adherence to legal protocols is essential to maintaining its integrity. Any manipulation of case outcomes, whether by downgrading crimes to lesser offences or exaggerating charges for personal or political motives, undermines public trust. Therefore, the police must remain committed to fairness and objectivity, reinforcing their role as impartial enforcers of the law and guardians of justice.

Not all crimes committed in Bangladesh come to the attention of the police, as various factors deter individuals from reporting incidents. Fear of retaliation, lack of trust in law enforcement, social stigma, and the lengthy legal process often discourage victims and witnesses from coming forward. Many people, particularly those from marginalised communities, may feel powerless or believe that seeking justice will bring more hardship than resolution. Additionally, cultural and familial pressures sometimes compel victims to remain silent, especially in cases of domestic violence, sexual offences, or financial fraud. Crimes involving influential individuals or organised groups may also go unreported due to fear of repercussions. Furthermore, the complexity and perceived inefficiency of the criminal justice system contribute to the general reluctance to engage with law enforcement, as many view the process as cumbersome, time-consuming, and potentially more distressing than the crime itself. As a result, the true extent of criminal activities remains obscured, leading to an under-representation of crime in official statistics and hindering efforts to implement effective law enforcement strategies. Therefore, police officers must take a proactive approach in registering cases promptly and without any obstacles to uphold the rule of law.

In today’s digital era, there is a growing public demand for an efficient and transparent online system for criminal case registration to eliminate bureaucratic hurdles, reduce delays, and minimise human discretion. Such a system would allow victims to file FIRs from home without intimidation or corruption while ensuring real-time documentation to prevent intentional delays by law enforcement. Following a directive from the chief advisor of the interim government, efforts are underway to implement this digital platform, which would enable swift intervention, automated case tracking, and integration with forensic databases. By enhancing transparency and accountability, an online system could revolutionise Bangladesh’s criminal justice process, provided it is user-friendly, secure, and legally validated to protect data and ensure accessibility for all. However, not everyone in Bangladesh is proficient in digital communication. Therefore, a user-friendly system must be implemented, ensuring direct access without the need for intermediaries.

Registering a criminal case in Bangladesh is a critical step in ensuring justice, yet it remains fraught with challenges such as police discretion, political influence, corruption, delays, and misuse of the system. While legal provisions exist to facilitate FIR registration, their effectiveness is often undermined by institutional weaknesses. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-pronged approach, including stronger legal safeguards, enhanced police accountability, judicial reforms, and public awareness initiatives. By ensuring a more transparent, efficient, and accessible system for case registration, Bangladesh can take significant strides toward a fairer and more robust criminal justice system.

Writer:
Dr Md Motiar Rahman is a retired deputy inspector general of police.

Source: https://www.newagebd.net/post/opinion/262705/vision-for-ideal-police-force

80

Common Forum/Request/Suggestions / Making your next project a success story

« Last post by Farhana Haque on April 20, 2025, 11:26:53 AM »

Making your next project a success story

1. Don’t Just Follow the Plan— Live It
Planning is powerful, but adaptability is king. Your Gantt chart won’t save you when the internet dies or a team member gets sick. Stay flexible, alert, and human.

2.Think Like a Bridge
You’re not just the manager—you’re the bridge between chaos and clarity. Between the dream and the deadline. Build strong connections: between people, processes, and purpose.

3.Tools Don’t Run Projects - 'People Do'.
Yes, you learned all about MS Project, Jira, or Asana. But what runs smoother than software? A motivated, respected team. Listen more than you speak. Appreciate more than you instruct.

4.Time Is Slippery So Guard It Like Treasure.
Start your day by asking: "What’s the one thing that will move this project forward today? Then guard your time like your success depends on it. Because it does.

5.Communicate Like It’s Oxygen
Weekly meetings are good. Real-time check-ins are better. Silence breeds confusion. Over Communication (the kind that feels like alignment) builds trust and momentum.

6.Always Ask: “Are We Still Solving the Right Problem?”
Scope creep often comes in a pretty disguise. Stay close to your project goal. If the target shifts, own the pivot, don’t let it own you.

7.Review Reflect & Reboot
When it’s over, don’t just close the file. Sit with the team. What worked? What flopped? What will you never do again? Lessons learned are future victories stored.

Remember that- "A successful project isn’t just “on time” and “within budget.”

👍 It’s when your team grows.
👍 Your client smiles.
👍 And you walk away wiser.

#ProjectManagement #PMITraining #LeadershipInAction#SmartProjectMoves #PeopleOverProcess #TeamDrivenSuccess #RealProjectTips #PMSuccessStory