G20 Summit: Grand ambition but limited expectations

Author Topic: G20 Summit: Grand ambition but limited expectations  (Read 127 times)

Offline fatema nusrat chowdhury

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
G20 Summit: Grand ambition but limited expectations
« on: February 25, 2015, 03:28:28 PM »
It is a great way to say good bye to an outgoing US President. With caviar and $300 bottle wines on the menu, George W. Bush, the lame-duck President of the United States, is playing host to the heads of 20 rich nations and emerging economies of the world at the summit which is under way this weekend in Washington.

Close observers now believe that not much thought went into the planning of this summit before it was called. It is almost like the hastily prepared $700 billion bailout package hashed by the US Treasury to shore up the US financial system which was on the brink of collapse. Its focus had to be changed twice already. First, it was targeted at the removal of bad assets with banks and financial institutions, which Paul Krugman described as "trash for cash". Then it changed focus and went for capitalisation of banks.

According to the latest development, Mr. Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary, has decided to address the problem of frozen credit markets instead.

Anyway, the pressure coming from the French President, Nicholas Sarkozy, and the British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, was too great for President Bush not to act. What is clear is that, given the predicament in which the world economy is in, finding effective solutions for a sustainable global financial order will be no mean feat, one that would certainly require much more serious deliberations than what is on offer at the hurriedly called summit of heads of states.

The notion that this summit would become a Bretton Woods II is fading fast. President Bush would be happy if the summit laid the "foundations for reforms". At best, the hope is that they would at least agree on some basic guidelines on which to move the technical summits that are being planned down the road. Together with the follow up summits, something concrete and lasting might emerge.

The summit already started when this paper went to press. There is no denying that the stakes are high. But the first damper to the events is placed by the fact that there is a President-elect in the US who does not see eye to eye on fundamental economic issues with the current administration. Barack Obama has intelligently chosen to sit out the summit which will be attended by his chosen representatives who are only peripherally involved with his core transition team.

As such, come January 2009, the new administration might not be inclined to follow through on all the policy commitments of the Bush era, particularly on policies relating to resuscitating the US economy and the global economy with it. That makes it all the more likely that the European leaders, in particular, would rather wait for the follow-up meeting which the French President is already signaling to convene shortly after Obama's inauguration.

There is a clear divergence of views between the US position and that of the Europeans on the issue of what reforms are absolutely necessary. The US Treasury - and the IMF with it -- has taken the view that existing shortcomings of the financial sector need to be fixed and there is no need for a Bretton Woods type overhaul of the system. Contributions from China, Saudi Arabia and gulf oil-exporting countries are being sought to bolster IMF's $250 billion reserves.